TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients-Part 2: Peri-and post-procedural managementEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline
AU - Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
AU - Arvanitakis, Marianna
AU - Despott, Edward J.
AU - Ballarin, Asuncion
AU - Beyna, Torsten
AU - Boeykens, Kurt
AU - Elbe, Peter
AU - Gisbertz, Ingrid
AU - Hoyois, Alice
AU - Mosteanu, Ofelia
AU - Sanders, David S.
AU - Schmidt, Peter T.
AU - Schneider, Stéphane M.
AU - van Hooft, Jeanin E.
N1 - Funding Information: T. Beyna receives consultancy honoraria and lecture fees from Olympus and Boston Scientific (ongoing), and lecture fees from Medtronic, the Falk Foundation, and Erbe. E.J. Despott has received consultancy fees and speaker’s honoraria from Boston Scientific, Ambu, and Fuji-film (2007 to 2019); his department has received educational grants from Fujifilm, Pentax, Olympus, Boston Scientific, Norgine, Cook, Erbe, Medtronic, Ankon, Diagmed, and US Endoscopy (2017 to 2019). S.M. Schneider has been a board member for Nutricia France (2016 to 2018); he has been or is a consultant for Laboratoires Grand Fontaine (2013), Nestlé Health Sciences (2020), and Baxter (2019). J. E. van Hooft has received lecture fees from Medtronic (2014 to 2015, 2019) and Cook Medical (2019), and consultancy fees from Boston Scientific (2014 to 2017); her department has received research grants from Cook Medical (2014 to 2019), and Abbott (2014 to 2017). M. Arvanitakis, A. Ballarin, K. Boeykens, P. Elbe, I. Gisbertz, P. Gkolfakis, A. Hoyois, O. Mosteanu, D. Sanders, and P. Thelin-Schmidt declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - Main recommendations ESGE recommends the pull technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer (push) technique for PEG placement in cases where the pull method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE). Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed blindly at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex). Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3-4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1-2cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
AB - Main recommendations ESGE recommends the pull technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer (push) technique for PEG placement in cases where the pull method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE). Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed blindly at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex). Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3-4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J. Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1-2cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098220369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1331-8080
DO - https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1331-8080
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33348410
SN - 0013-726X
VL - 53
SP - 178
EP - 195
JO - Endoscopy
JF - Endoscopy
IS - 2
ER -