TY - JOUR
T1 - Enoxaparin for symptomatic COVID-19 managed in the ambulatory setting
T2 - An individual patient level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC trials
AU - Barco, Stefano
AU - Virdone, Saverio
AU - Götschi, Andrea
AU - Ageno, Walter
AU - Arcelus, Juan I.
AU - Bingisser, Roland
AU - Colucci, Giuseppe
AU - Cools, Frank
AU - Duerschmied, Daniel
AU - Gibbs, Harry
AU - Fumagalli, Riccardo M.
AU - Gerber, Bernhard
AU - Haas, Sylvia
AU - Himmelreich, Jelle C. L.
AU - Hobbs, Richard
AU - Hobohm, Lukas
AU - Jacobson, Barry
AU - Kayani, Gloria
AU - Lopes, Renato D.
AU - MacCallum, Peter
AU - Micieli, Evy
AU - OVID and ETHIC Investigators
AU - Righini, Marc
AU - Robert-Ebadi, Helia
AU - Rocha, Ana Thereza
AU - Rosemann, Thomas
AU - Sawhney, Jitendra
AU - Schellong, Sebastian
AU - Sebastian, Tim
AU - Spirk, David
AU - Stortecky, Stefan
AU - Turpie, Alexander G. G.
AU - Voci, Davide
AU - Kucher, Nils
AU - Pieper, Karen
AU - Held, Ulrike
AU - Kakkar, Ajay K.
N1 - Funding Information: OVID was an academic trial supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; National Research Programme COVID-19 NRP78: 198352 ), University Hospital Zurich , University of Zurich , Dr-Ing Georg Pollert (Berlin) , Johanna Dürmüller-Bol Foundation . The ETHIC trial was funded by the Thrombosis Research Institute (London, UK) and Sanofi UK . Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - Background: Antithrombotic treatment may improve the disease course in non-critically ill, symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients. Methods: We performed an individual patient-level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC randomized controlled trials, which compared enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for either 14 (OVID) or 21 days (ETHIC) vs. no thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one additional risk factor. The primary efficacy outcome included all-cause hospitalization and all-cause death within 30 days from randomization. Both studies were prematurely stopped for futility. Secondary efficacy outcomes were major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, arterial cardiovascular events, or their composite occurring within 30 days from randomization. The same outcomes were assessed over a 90-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding (ISTH criteria). Results: A total of 691 patients were randomized: 339 to receive enoxaparin and 352 to the control group. Over 30-day follow-up, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.0 % of patients in the enoxaparin group vs. 5.8 % of controls for a risk ratio (RR) of 1.05 (95%CI 0.57–1.92). The incidence of major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events and arterial cardiovascular events was 0.9 % vs. 1.8 %, respectively (RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.13–2.06). Most cardiovascular thromboembolic events were represented by symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, occurring in 0.6 % vs. 1.5 % of patients, respectively. A similar distribution of outcomes between the treatment groups was observed over 90 days. No major bleeding occurred in the enoxaparin group vs. one (0.3 %) in the control group. Conclusions: We found no evidence for the clinical benefit of early administration of enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. These results should be interpreted taking into consideration the relatively low occurrence of events.
AB - Background: Antithrombotic treatment may improve the disease course in non-critically ill, symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients. Methods: We performed an individual patient-level analysis of the OVID and ETHIC randomized controlled trials, which compared enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis for either 14 (OVID) or 21 days (ETHIC) vs. no thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one additional risk factor. The primary efficacy outcome included all-cause hospitalization and all-cause death within 30 days from randomization. Both studies were prematurely stopped for futility. Secondary efficacy outcomes were major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, arterial cardiovascular events, or their composite occurring within 30 days from randomization. The same outcomes were assessed over a 90-day follow-up. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding (ISTH criteria). Results: A total of 691 patients were randomized: 339 to receive enoxaparin and 352 to the control group. Over 30-day follow-up, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.0 % of patients in the enoxaparin group vs. 5.8 % of controls for a risk ratio (RR) of 1.05 (95%CI 0.57–1.92). The incidence of major symptomatic venous thromboembolic events and arterial cardiovascular events was 0.9 % vs. 1.8 %, respectively (RR 0.52; 95%CI 0.13–2.06). Most cardiovascular thromboembolic events were represented by symptomatic venous thromboembolic events, occurring in 0.6 % vs. 1.5 % of patients, respectively. A similar distribution of outcomes between the treatment groups was observed over 90 days. No major bleeding occurred in the enoxaparin group vs. one (0.3 %) in the control group. Conclusions: We found no evidence for the clinical benefit of early administration of enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. These results should be interpreted taking into consideration the relatively low occurrence of events.
KW - Anticoagulation
KW - COVID-19
KW - Death
KW - Trial
KW - Venous thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168950118&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2023.08.009
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2023.08.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 37625200
SN - 0049-3848
VL - 230
SP - 27
EP - 32
JO - Thrombosis research
JF - Thrombosis research
ER -