Evaluation of 9 biomarkers for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing coronary angiography: Findings from the LUdwigshafen RIsk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study

Bríain Ó Hartaigh, G. Neil Thomas, Jos A. Bosch, Karla Hemming, Stefan Pilz, Adrian Loerbroks, Marcus E. Kleber, Tanja B. Grammer, Joachim E. Fischer, Guenther Silbernagel, Andreas Tomaschitz, Winfried März

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Conventional factors do not fully explain the distribution of cardiovascular outcomes. Biomarkers are known to participate in well-established pathways associated with cardiovascular disease, and may therefore provide further information over and above conventional risk factors. This study sought to determine whether individual and/or combined assessment of 9 biomarkers improved discrimination, calibration and reclassification of cardiovascular mortality. Methods 3267 patients (2283 men), aged 18-95 years, at intermediate-to-high-risk of cardiovascular disease were followed in this prospective cohort study. Conventional risk factors and biomarkers were included based on forward and backward Cox proportional stepwise selection models. Results During 10-years of follow-up, 546 fatal cardiovascular events occurred. Four biomarkers (interleukin-6, neutrophils, von Willebrand factor, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D) were retained during stepwise selection procedures for subsequent analyses. Simultaneous inclusion of these biomarkers significantly improved discrimination as measured by the C-index (0.78, P = 0.0001), and integrated discrimination improvement (0.0219, P < 0.0001). Collectively, these biomarkers improved net reclassification for cardiovascular death by 10.6% (P < 0.0001) when added to the conventional risk model. Conclusions In terms of adverse cardiovascular prognosis, a biomarker panel consisting of interleukin-6, neutrophils, von Willebrand factor, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D offered significant incremental value beyond that conveyed by simple conventional risk factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2609-2615
Number of pages7
JournalInternational journal of cardiology
Volume168
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2013

Keywords

  • Biomarker
  • Cardiovascular
  • Discrimination
  • Reclassification
  • Risk factor

Cite this