TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and first results of the ‘Trials-within-Cohorts’ (TwiCs) design in patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer
AU - Tomassen, Mathijs L.
AU - Damen, Pim J. J.
AU - Verkooijen, Helena M.
AU - Peters, Max
AU - van der Stap, Janneke
AU - van Lindert, Anne S. R.
AU - Verhoeff, Joost J. C.
AU - van Rossum, Peter S. N.
N1 - Funding Information: No external funding was involved in this study. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: ‘Trials-within-Cohorts’ (TwiCs), previously known as ‘cohort multiple randomized controlled trials’ is a pragmatic trial design, supporting an efficient and representative recruitment of patients for (future) trials. To our knowledge, the ‘COhort for Lung cancer Outcome Reporting and trial inclusion’ (COLOR) is the first TwiCs in lung cancer patients. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility and first year results of COLOR. Material and Methods: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer referred to the Radiotherapy department were eligible to participate in the ongoing prospective COLOR study. At inclusion, written informed consent was requested for use of patient data, participation in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and willingness to participate in (future) trials. Feasibility was studied by assessing participation and comparing baseline PROs to EORTC reference values. First-year results of PROs at baseline and 3 months after inclusion were evaluated separately for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and conventional radiotherapy patients. Results: Of the 338 eligible patients between July 2020 and July 2021, 169 (50%) participated. Among these, 127 (75%) gave informed consent to PROs participation and 110 (65%) were willing to participate in (future) trials. The inclusion percentage dropped from 77% to 33% when the information procedure was switched from in-person to by phone (due to COVID-19 pandemic measures). Baseline PROs for physical and cognitive functioning were comparable in COLOR patients compared to the EORTC reference values. No significant changes in PROs were observed 3 months after inclusion, except for a slight increase in pain scores in the SBRT group (n = 97). Conclusions: The TwiCs-design appears feasible in lung cancer patients with fair participation rates (although negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic). With a planned expansion to other centers, the COLOR-study is expected to enable multiple (randomized) evaluations of experimental interventions with important advantages for recruitment, generalizability, and long-term outcome data collection.
AB - Background: ‘Trials-within-Cohorts’ (TwiCs), previously known as ‘cohort multiple randomized controlled trials’ is a pragmatic trial design, supporting an efficient and representative recruitment of patients for (future) trials. To our knowledge, the ‘COhort for Lung cancer Outcome Reporting and trial inclusion’ (COLOR) is the first TwiCs in lung cancer patients. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility and first year results of COLOR. Material and Methods: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer referred to the Radiotherapy department were eligible to participate in the ongoing prospective COLOR study. At inclusion, written informed consent was requested for use of patient data, participation in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and willingness to participate in (future) trials. Feasibility was studied by assessing participation and comparing baseline PROs to EORTC reference values. First-year results of PROs at baseline and 3 months after inclusion were evaluated separately for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and conventional radiotherapy patients. Results: Of the 338 eligible patients between July 2020 and July 2021, 169 (50%) participated. Among these, 127 (75%) gave informed consent to PROs participation and 110 (65%) were willing to participate in (future) trials. The inclusion percentage dropped from 77% to 33% when the information procedure was switched from in-person to by phone (due to COVID-19 pandemic measures). Baseline PROs for physical and cognitive functioning were comparable in COLOR patients compared to the EORTC reference values. No significant changes in PROs were observed 3 months after inclusion, except for a slight increase in pain scores in the SBRT group (n = 97). Conclusions: The TwiCs-design appears feasible in lung cancer patients with fair participation rates (although negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic). With a planned expansion to other centers, the COLOR-study is expected to enable multiple (randomized) evaluations of experimental interventions with important advantages for recruitment, generalizability, and long-term outcome data collection.
KW - Trials-within-cohorts
KW - feasibility
KW - lung cancer
KW - patient-reported-outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150819539&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2183778
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2183778
M3 - Article
C2 - 36927251
SN - 0284-186X
VL - 62
SP - 237
EP - 244
JO - Acta Oncologica
JF - Acta Oncologica
IS - 3
ER -