TY - JOUR
T1 - Fetal hemodynamic response to aortic valvuloplasty and postnatal outcome: a European multicenter study
AU - the Fetal Working Group of the AEPC
AU - Kovacevic, A.
AU - Öhman, A.
AU - Tulzer, G.
AU - Herberg, U.
AU - Dangel, J.
AU - Carvalho, J. S.
AU - Fesslova, V.
AU - Jicinska, H.
AU - Sarkola, T.
AU - Pedroza, C.
AU - Averiss, I. E.
AU - Mellander, M.
AU - Gardiner, H. M.
AU - Bartrons, Joaquim
AU - Bulock, Frances
AU - Shebani, Suhair
AU - Clur, Sally Ann
AU - Daehnert, Ingo
AU - di Salvo, Giovanni
AU - Heying, Ruth
AU - Gewillig, Marc
AU - Grijseels, Els
AU - Koopmann, Laurens
AU - Makikallio, Kaarin
AU - Tekay, Aydin
AU - Leskinen, Markku
AU - Manning, Nicky
AU - Archer, Nick
AU - Oberhoffer, Renate
AU - Romeo, Cristina
AU - Ejvind Sørensen, Keld
AU - Richens, Trevor
AU - Schmidt, Klaus
AU - Seale, Anna
AU - Jowett, Victoria
AU - Tissot, Cecile
AU - Tomek, Viktor
AU - Uhlemann, Frank
AU - Vejlstrup, Niels
AU - Weil, Jochen
AU - Koleśnik, Adam
AU - Dębska, Marzena
AU - Włoch, Agata
AU - Dryżek, Paweł
AU - Chojnicki, Maciej
AU - Bartrons, Joaquim
AU - Bulock, Frances
AU - Shebani, Suhair
AU - Daehnert, Ingo
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Objective: Fetal aortic stenosis may progress to hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Fetal valvuloplasty (FV) has been proposed to improve left heart hemodynamics and maintain biventricular (BV) circulation. The aim of this study was to assess FV efficacy by comparing survival and postnatal circulation between fetuses that underwent FV and those that did not. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of fetuses with aortic stenosis that underwent FV between 2005 and 2012, compared with contemporaneously enrolled natural history (NH) cases sharing similar characteristics at presentation but not undergoing FV. Main outcome measures were overall survival, BV-circulation survival and survival after birth. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic change and left heart growth. A propensity score model was created including 54/67 FV and 60/147 NH fetuses. Analyses were performed using logistic, Cox or linear regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) restricted to fetuses with a propensity score of 0.14–0.9, to create a final cohort for analysis of 42 FV and 29 NH cases. Results: FV was technically successful in 59/67 fetuses at a median age of 26 (21–34) weeks. There were 7/72 (10%) procedure-related losses, and 22/53 (42%) FV babies were delivered at < 37 weeks. IPTW demonstrated improved survival of liveborn infants following FV (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23–0.64; P = 0.0001), after adjusting for circulation and postnatal surgical center. Similar proportions had BV circulation (36% for the FV cohort and 38% for the NH cohort) and survival was similar between final circulations. Successful FV cases showed improved hemodynamic response and less deterioration of left heart growth compared with NH cases (P ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: We report improvements in fetal hemodynamics and preservation of left heart growth following successful FV compared with NH. While the proportion of those achieving a BV circulation outcome was similar in both cohorts, FV survivors showed improved survival independent of final circulation to 10 years' follow-up. However, FV is associated with a 10% procedure-related loss and increased prematurity compared with the NH cohort, and therefore the risk-to-benefit ratio remains uncertain. We recommend a carefully designed trial incorporating appropriate and integrated fetal and postnatal management strategies to account for center-specific practices, so that the benefits achieved by fetal therapy vs surgical strategy can be demonstrated clearly. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
AB - Objective: Fetal aortic stenosis may progress to hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Fetal valvuloplasty (FV) has been proposed to improve left heart hemodynamics and maintain biventricular (BV) circulation. The aim of this study was to assess FV efficacy by comparing survival and postnatal circulation between fetuses that underwent FV and those that did not. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study of fetuses with aortic stenosis that underwent FV between 2005 and 2012, compared with contemporaneously enrolled natural history (NH) cases sharing similar characteristics at presentation but not undergoing FV. Main outcome measures were overall survival, BV-circulation survival and survival after birth. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic change and left heart growth. A propensity score model was created including 54/67 FV and 60/147 NH fetuses. Analyses were performed using logistic, Cox or linear regression models with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) restricted to fetuses with a propensity score of 0.14–0.9, to create a final cohort for analysis of 42 FV and 29 NH cases. Results: FV was technically successful in 59/67 fetuses at a median age of 26 (21–34) weeks. There were 7/72 (10%) procedure-related losses, and 22/53 (42%) FV babies were delivered at < 37 weeks. IPTW demonstrated improved survival of liveborn infants following FV (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23–0.64; P = 0.0001), after adjusting for circulation and postnatal surgical center. Similar proportions had BV circulation (36% for the FV cohort and 38% for the NH cohort) and survival was similar between final circulations. Successful FV cases showed improved hemodynamic response and less deterioration of left heart growth compared with NH cases (P ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: We report improvements in fetal hemodynamics and preservation of left heart growth following successful FV compared with NH. While the proportion of those achieving a BV circulation outcome was similar in both cohorts, FV survivors showed improved survival independent of final circulation to 10 years' follow-up. However, FV is associated with a 10% procedure-related loss and increased prematurity compared with the NH cohort, and therefore the risk-to-benefit ratio remains uncertain. We recommend a carefully designed trial incorporating appropriate and integrated fetal and postnatal management strategies to account for center-specific practices, so that the benefits achieved by fetal therapy vs surgical strategy can be demonstrated clearly. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051057867&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28976617
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18913
DO - https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18913
M3 - Article
C2 - 28976617
SN - 0960-7692
VL - 52
SP - 221
EP - 229
JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
IS - 2
ER -