High resorption rates following glenoid augmentation procedures do not seem to lead to higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cain Rutgers, Lukas P. E. Verweij, Alexander A. Schuit, Inger N. Sierevelt, Faridi S. Jamaludin, Henk-Jan van der Woude, Michel P. J. van den Bekerom

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Bone augmentation techniques show a relatively high complication rate, which might be due to graft non-union and resorption. It is unclear which augmentation techniques demonstrate the highest amount of non-union and resorption and whether this leads to worse clinical or functional outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this review was (i) to compare non-union and resorption rates between surgical approaches, procedures, graft types, donor sites and fixation methods regarding clinical and functional outcomes and (ii) determine whether high non-union or resorption rates lead to less favorable clinical or functional outcomes. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements were followed. PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid) and Cochrane Library were searched on December 15th 2021 for studies examining bone graft non-union or resorption using radiograph or CT following glenoid augmentation to treat anterior shoulder dislocation. Results: The search resulted in 103 inclusions, comprising 5,128 glenoid augmentations. When comparing pooled proportions of bony union, graft fracture rate, hardware failure rate, recurrence rate, return to sports and Rowe score, most results were similar between approaches, procedures, graft types, donor sites and fixation methods. High resorption rates were seen for allograft augmentation (74.3; 95% CI: 39.8–92.7) compared to autograft augmentation (15.5; 95% CI 10.1–23.2), but this was not associated with higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes. Meta-analyses (8 studies; 494 patients) demonstrated no difference in incomplete and complete non-union rates between arthroscopic and open procedures; however, both analyses showed substantial heterogeneity. Higher partial resorption rates were observed on CT (48.0; 95% CI 43.3–52.7) compared to radiograph (14.1; 95% CI 10.9–18.1). Three studies comprising 267 shoulders demonstrated a higher rate of non-union and recurrence in smokers, whereas one study comprising 38 shoulders did not. Conclusion: Non-union and resorption rates were similar among procedures, grafts and fixation methods. Higher resorption rates were observed in allografts, but this was not associated with higher recurrence rates or worse clinical outcomes. Pooling data demonstrated substantial heterogeneity and definitions varied among studies, warranting more standardized measuring. Level of evidence: IV.
Original languageEnglish
JournalKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Allografts
  • Bone augmentation
  • Bone grafts
  • Bone union
  • Bony stabilization
  • Imaging and radiology
  • Joint stabilization surgery
  • Shoulder injuries
  • Shoulder instability
  • Sports medicine

Cite this