TY - JOUR
T1 - Human relevance of pre-clinical studies in stem cell therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of large animal models of ischaemic heart disease
AU - van der Spoel, Tycho I. G.
AU - Jansen Of Lorkeers, Sanne J.
AU - Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
AU - van Belle, Eric
AU - Gyongyosi, Mariann
AU - Sluijter, Joost P. G.
AU - Cramer, Maarten J.
AU - Doevendans, Pieter A.
AU - Chamuleau, Steven A. J.
PY - 2011/9/1
Y1 - 2011/9/1
N2 - Aims Stem cell therapy is a treatment strategy for ischaemic heart disease patients. Meta-analysis of randomized human trials showed <5 improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Meta-analysis of available pre-clinical data of ischaemic heart disease could provide important clues to design human clinical trials. Methods and resultsRandom-effects meta-analysis was performed on pig, dog, or sheep studies investigating the effect of cardiac stem cell therapy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy (52 studies; n 888 animals). Endpoints were LVEF and death. Ischaemia/reperfusion infarction was performed in 23 studies and chronic occlusion in 29 studies. Pooled analysis showed a LVEF difference of 7.5 at follow-up after cell therapy vs. control (95 confidence interval, 6.28.9; P < 0.001). By exploratory multivariable meta-regression, significant predictors of LVEF improvement were: cell type [bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNC) showed less effect than other cell types, e.g. mesenchymal stem cells; P 0.040] and type of infarction (left anterior descending artery 8.0 vs. left circumflex artery 5.8; P 0.045). Cell therapy was not associated with increased mortality (P 0.68). Sensitivity analysis showed trends towards more improvement with higher cell number (<107), chronic occlusion models, and late injections (>1 week). After follow-up of 8 weeks, the effect of cell therapy decreased to 6. ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that large animal models are valid to predict the outcome of clinical trials. Our results showed that cell therapy is safe and leads to a preserved LVEF. Future trials should focus on cell types other than BM-MNC, large infarction, and strategies to obtain sustained effects. © 2011 The Author.
AB - Aims Stem cell therapy is a treatment strategy for ischaemic heart disease patients. Meta-analysis of randomized human trials showed <5 improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Meta-analysis of available pre-clinical data of ischaemic heart disease could provide important clues to design human clinical trials. Methods and resultsRandom-effects meta-analysis was performed on pig, dog, or sheep studies investigating the effect of cardiac stem cell therapy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy (52 studies; n 888 animals). Endpoints were LVEF and death. Ischaemia/reperfusion infarction was performed in 23 studies and chronic occlusion in 29 studies. Pooled analysis showed a LVEF difference of 7.5 at follow-up after cell therapy vs. control (95 confidence interval, 6.28.9; P < 0.001). By exploratory multivariable meta-regression, significant predictors of LVEF improvement were: cell type [bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNC) showed less effect than other cell types, e.g. mesenchymal stem cells; P 0.040] and type of infarction (left anterior descending artery 8.0 vs. left circumflex artery 5.8; P 0.045). Cell therapy was not associated with increased mortality (P 0.68). Sensitivity analysis showed trends towards more improvement with higher cell number (<107), chronic occlusion models, and late injections (>1 week). After follow-up of 8 weeks, the effect of cell therapy decreased to 6. ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that large animal models are valid to predict the outcome of clinical trials. Our results showed that cell therapy is safe and leads to a preserved LVEF. Future trials should focus on cell types other than BM-MNC, large infarction, and strategies to obtain sustained effects. © 2011 The Author.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79958162790&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21498423
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvr113
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvr113
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21498423
SN - 0008-6363
VL - 91
SP - 649
EP - 658
JO - Cardiovascular research
JF - Cardiovascular research
IS - 4
ER -