Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for nonischemic diabetic ulcers: A systematic review

Rutger C. Lalieu, Robin J. Brouwer, Dirk T. Ubbink, Rigo Hoencamp, René Bol Raap, Rob A. van Hulst

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes, which affects 25% of patients and may ultimately lead to amputation of affected limbs. Research suggests hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves healing of these ulcers. However, this has not been reflected in previous reviews, possibly because they did not differentiate between patients with and without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of published literature in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases on nonischemic diabetic foot ulcers with outcome measures including complete ulcer healing, amputation rate (major and minor), and mortality. Seven studies were included, of which two were randomized clinical trials. Two studies found no difference in major amputation rate, whereas one large retrospective study found 2% more major amputations in the hyperbaric oxygen group. However, this study did not correct for baseline differences. Two studies showed no significant difference in minor amputation rate. Five studies reporting on complete wound healing showed no significant differences. In conclusion, the current evidence suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy does not accelerate wound healing and does not prevent major or minor amputations in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer without peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Based on the available evidence, routine clinical use of this therapy cannot be recommended. However, the available research for this specific subgroup of patients is scarce, and physicians should counsel patients on expected risks and benefits. Additional research, focusing especially on patient selection criteria, is needed to better identify patients that might profit from this therapy modality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-275
Number of pages10
JournalWound repair and regeneration
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date31 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

Cite this