Improved long-term suppression of HIV-1 replication with a triple-class multidrug regimen compared with standard of care antiretroviral therapy

Rieneke M. E. van Praag, Ferdinand W. N. M. Wit, Suzanne Jurriaans, Frank de Wolf, Jan M. Prins, Joep M. A. Lange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The treatment of HIV-1-infected patients with triple-drug combination therapy results in profound suppression of viral replication. In most therapy-naive patients plasma HIV-1-RNA levels (pVL) drop below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) of currently used assays. In a large percentage of such patients, more sensitive assays provide evidence of residual viral replication. The question is whether more potent therapy can further suppress this residual replication. Methods: Thirty control patients who, using very strict criteria, had not experienced virological failure during 3 years of standard therapy, were compared with 10 patients treated with a five-drug regimen, consisting of three different classes of antiretroviral drugs (alternative multidrug regimen). A modified ultrasensitive assay with an LLQ of 5 copies/ml was used to re-test plasma obtained at week 48 and at three timepoints at and around week 144. Results: At weeks 48 and 144 pVL could be quantified significantly more frequently in control patients than in patients using the alternative multidrug regimen (week 48: 42 versus 0% with quantifiable pVL, P = 0.017; week 144: 60 versus 14% with at least one quantifiable pVL, P = 0.036, respectively). A low baseline CD4T cell count was predictive of quantifiable pVL in control patients, but not in alternative multidrug patients. Conclusion: This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that the use of an alternative multidrug regimen results in stronger long-term suppression of pVL compared with clinically successful treatment with standard therapy. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)719-725
JournalAIDS (London, England)
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Cite this