In vitro laxity-testers for knee joints of mice

L. Blankevoort, G. J. van Osch, B. Janssen, E. E. Hekman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The knee joints of mice can be used as a model for studying the effects of interventions on knee laxity. The goal of this study was to quantify knee joint laxity in vitro. Three devices were developed: a positioning- and cementing device, an anterior-posterior (AP) laxity tester and a varus-valgus (VV) laxity tester. The positioning and cementing device was used to position the joint in a reproducible way and to attach clamping pins to the proximal femur and distal tibia using PM MA. The clamping pins were used to fix the joint to the AP- and VV-testers. In both testers the load was applied by means of a spindle-actuated spring while load and displacements were measured simultaneously. The load--displacement data were used to calculate displacement and compliance parameters. The performance of the testers was evaluated by testing 5 normal knee joints of 5 mice. Total AP-translation at + or - 0.8 N was 0.43 (+ or - 0.16 S.D.) mm with compliances of 0.14 (+ or - 0.05 S.D.) mm N(1) and 0.12 ( + or - 10.05 S.D.) mm N(-1) at 0.8 N posterior and anterior force, respectively. Total VV-rotation at + or - 4 Nmm was 17.2 (+ or - 2.6 S.D.) degrees with compliances of 0.9 degrees Nmm(-1) (+ or - 0.2 degrees Nmm(-1) S.D.) and 1.0 Nmm(-1) (+ or - 0.4 degrees Nmm(-1) S.D.) at 4 Nmm valgus and varus moment, respectively. The contributions of the deformations of the bones and the fixtures to the rotations were negligible in the VV-test. In the AP-test they account for approximately 0.07 ( + or - 0.03 S.D.)mm of the total AP-translation. This will not affect the utilization of the device for comparative analysis. It is concluded that in in vitro evaluation of AP- and VV-laxity in knees of mice is feasible with sufficient accuracy for evaluation of changes after ligament damage
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-806
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Cite this