Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prognostic Impact of Type Ib Endoleak Following Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Scoping Review

Gianmarco Zuccon, Mario D'Oria, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves, Carlota Fernandez-Prendes, Kevin Mani, Daniel Caldeira, Mark Koelemay, Daniele Bissacco, Santi Trimarchi, Isabelle van Herzeele, Anders Wanhainen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The primary objectives of this scoping review were to assess the rate of and risk factors for type Ib endoleak and to evaluate the extent of the evidence base that links type Ib endoleak to short and long term outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: Potentially eligible studies were searched in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO Citation Index, Russian Science Citation Index, and KCI-Korean Journal Database. A scoping review was performed according to PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. Results: A total of 27 articles (four prospective registries and 23 retrospective cohort studies) dealing with type Ib endoleak were included in the final analysis. The number of patients reported on was 7 197, with follow up ranging between 12 months and 93 months. The reported frequency of type Ib endoleak in patients treated with EVAR ranged from 0% to 8%, Patient and or procedure related factors associated with risk of type Ib endoleak were (1) common iliac artery (CIA) diameter ˃ 18 mm requiring use of flared stent graft limbs (FLs) ˃ 20 mm, (2) length of CIA landing zone ˂ 20 mm, (3) marked iliac tortuosity, and (4) large initial AAA diameter. Depending on the study, 50 – 100% of type Ib endoleaks were corrected by endovascular means, with a reported immediate technical success of 100% in the studies providing this information. Conclusion: Type Ib endoleak after EVAR has been reported to occur in 0 – 8% of cases. Several anatomical features, including CIA diameter ˃ 18 mm or requiring the use of FLs ˃ 20 mm, length of CIA landing zone ˂ 20 mm, marked iliac tortuosity, and large initial AAA diameter, could increase the risk of type Ib endoleak and may require alternative therapeutic options and or more stringent follow up. Therefore, this updated scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of the frequency, risk factors, prognosis, and treatment of type Ib endoleaks, and has identified knowledge gaps in the literature to guide further studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)352-361
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume66
Issue number3
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Keywords

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Endoleak
  • Endovascular aneurysm repair
  • Outcome
  • Reporting standards
  • Review

Cite this