Interseason variability of a functional movement test, the 9+screening battery, in professional male football players

A. Bakken, S. Targett, T. Bere, C. Eirale, A. Farooq, J. L. Tol, R. Whiteley, E. Witvrouw, K. M. Khan, R. Bahr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Nine Plus screening battery test (9+) is a functional movement test intended to identify limitations in fundamental movement patterns predisposing athletes to injury. However, the interseason variability is unknown. Aim To examine the variability of the 9+ test between 2 consecutive seasons in professional male football players. Methods Asymptomatic Qatar Star League players (n= 220) completed the 9+ at the beginning of the 2013 and 2014 seasons. Time-loss injuries in training and matches were obtained from the Aspetar Injury and Illness Surveillance Program. No intervention was initiated between test occasions. Results A significant increase in the mean total score of 1.6 points (95% CI 1.0 to 2.2, p <0.001) was found from season 1 (22.2 +/- 4.1 (SD)) to season 2 (23.8 +/- 3.3). The variability was large, as shown by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.24 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.36) and a minimal detectable change (MDC) of 8.7 points. Of the 220 players, 136 (61.8%) suffered a timeloss injury between the 2 tests. There was an improvement in mean total scores in the injured (+ 2.0 +/- 0.4 (SE), p <0.001) group but not in the uninjured group (+ 0.9 +/- 0.5, p=0.089). The variability from season 1 to season 2 was large both in the injured (ICC 0.25, 0.09 to 0.40, MDC 8.3) and uninjured (ICC 0.24, 0.02 to 0.43, MDC 9.1) groups. Conclusions The 9+ demonstrated substantial intraindividual variability in the total score between 2 consecutive seasons, irrespective of injury. A change above 8 points is necessary to represent a real change in the 9+ test between seasons
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1081-1086
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume51
Issue number14
Early online date2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this