Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections Less Than 6 Months Before Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is It Safe? A Retrospective Cohort Study in 565 Patients

Sascha Colen, Alexander Hoorntje, Liselore Maeckelbergh, Marcus van Diemen, Alain Dalemans, Michel P. J. van den Bekerom, Michiel Mulier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IAHA) can be injected into an osteoarthritic hip joint to reduce pain and to improve functionality. Several studies report IAHA to be safe, with minor adverse effects that normally disappear spontaneously within a week. However, intra-articular corticosteroids prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been associated with increased infection rates. This association has never been investigated for IAHA and THA. We aimed to assess the influence of IAHA on the outcome of THA, with an emphasis on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods: At a mean follow-up of 52 months (±18), we compared complication rates, including superficial and deep PJIs, of THA in patients who received an IAHA injection ≤6 months prior to surgery (injection group) with that of patients undergoing THA without any previous injection in the ipsilateral hip (control group). One hundred thirteen patients (118 hips) could be retrospectively included in the injection group, and 452 patients (495 hips) in the control group. Results: No differences in baseline characteristics nor risk factors for PJI between the 2 groups were found. The clinical outcomes in terms of VAS pain scores (1.4 vs 1.7 points, P =.11), modified Harris Hip Scores (77 vs 75 points, P =.09), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (79 vs 76 points, P =.24) did not differ between the injection group and the control group. Also, complications in terms of persistent wound leakage (0% vs 1.2%, P =.60), thromboembolic events (0% vs 0.6%, P = 1.00), periprosthetic fractures (1.7% vs 1.2%, P =.65), and dislocations (0% vs 0.4%, P = 1.00) did not differ. However, in the injection group there was a higher rate of PJIs (4% vs 0%, P <.001) and postoperative wound infections (9% vs 3%, P =.01), compared to the control group. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that IAHA performed 6 months or less prior to THA may pose a risk for increased rates of PJI. We recommend refraining from performing THA within 6 months after IAHA administration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1003-1008
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume36
Issue number3
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • arthroplasty
  • complications
  • hip
  • hyaluronic acid
  • infection
  • viscosupplementation

Cite this