TY - JOUR
T1 - Knee joint stabilization therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and knee instability
T2 - subgroup analyses in a randomized, controlled trial
AU - Knoop, Jesper
AU - van der Leeden, Marike
AU - Roorda, Leo D
AU - Thorstensson, Carina A
AU - van der Esch, Martin
AU - Peter, Wilfred F
AU - de Rooij, Mariëtte
AU - Lems, Willem F
AU - Dekker, Joost
AU - Steultjens, Martijn P M
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To test whether knee stabilization therapy, prior to strength/functional training, may have added value in reducing activity limitations only in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have knee instability and (i) low upper leg muscle strength, (ii) impaired knee proprioception, (iii) high knee laxity, or (iv) frequent episodes of knee instability.DESIGN: Subgroup analyses in a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 exercise programmes (with/without knee stabilization therapy) (STABILITY; NTR1475).PATIENTS: Participants from the STABILITY-trial with clinical knee osteoarthritis and knee instability (n = 159).METHODS: Effect modification by upper leg muscle strength, knee proprioception, knee laxity, and patient-reported knee instability were determined using the interaction terms "treatment group subgroup factor", with the outcome measures WOMAC physical function (primary), numeric rating scale pain and the Get up and Go test (secondary).RESULTS: Effect modification by muscle strength was found for the primary outcome (p = 0.01), indicating that patients with greater muscle strength tend to benefit more from the experimental programme with additional knee stabilization training, while patients with lower muscle strength benefit more from the control programme.CONCLUSION: Knee stabilization therapy may have added value in patients with instability and strong muscles. Thus it may be beneficial if exercises target muscle strength prior to knee stabilization.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To test whether knee stabilization therapy, prior to strength/functional training, may have added value in reducing activity limitations only in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have knee instability and (i) low upper leg muscle strength, (ii) impaired knee proprioception, (iii) high knee laxity, or (iv) frequent episodes of knee instability.DESIGN: Subgroup analyses in a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 exercise programmes (with/without knee stabilization therapy) (STABILITY; NTR1475).PATIENTS: Participants from the STABILITY-trial with clinical knee osteoarthritis and knee instability (n = 159).METHODS: Effect modification by upper leg muscle strength, knee proprioception, knee laxity, and patient-reported knee instability were determined using the interaction terms "treatment group subgroup factor", with the outcome measures WOMAC physical function (primary), numeric rating scale pain and the Get up and Go test (secondary).RESULTS: Effect modification by muscle strength was found for the primary outcome (p = 0.01), indicating that patients with greater muscle strength tend to benefit more from the experimental programme with additional knee stabilization training, while patients with lower muscle strength benefit more from the control programme.CONCLUSION: Knee stabilization therapy may have added value in patients with instability and strong muscles. Thus it may be beneficial if exercises target muscle strength prior to knee stabilization.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Joint Instability/physiopathology
KW - Knee Joint/physiopathology
KW - Male
KW - Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology
KW - Self Report
KW - Severity of Illness Index
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1809
DO - https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1809
M3 - Article
C2 - 24910399
SN - 1650-1977
VL - 46
SP - 703
EP - 707
JO - Journal of rehabilitation medicine
JF - Journal of rehabilitation medicine
IS - 7
ER -