Level of clinical reasoning in intermediate nursing students explained by education year and days of internships per healthcare branches: A cross – sectional study

Janet Leijser, Bea Spek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Due to changes in health care nurses are achieving more responsibilities. Globally nurses are trained at different educational levels to become registered nurses. All nurses should be able to implement clinical reasoning in chronic and acute patient care. There is uncertainty in health care institutes about the level of performance of clinical reasoning in the intermediate nurses. Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the level of clinical reasoning in intermediate nursing students in different education years. Furthermore, we explored whether the level of clinical reasoning can be explained by years of education and numbers of internship days in different healthcare settings. Design, setting and participants: All second, third and fourth year (n = 151) nursing students of one nursing school in the Netherlands were invited to participate in this study. Levels of clinical reasoning were assessed using the Dutch Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (D - LCJR). Methods: Twelve experienced nurses assessed the students during two days at the beginning of their education year in an educational simulation setting. Following the assessment protocol, the Rubric was scored in an interview after the students saw their patient. Results: We assessed 119 students. Fourth-year students scored on a significant higher level of clinical reasoning compared to the second - and third-year students (p < 0.001). Forty five percent of them reached an accomplished level of clinical reasoning. Second- and third-year students scored similar in their level of clinical reasoning (p = 0.61). In addition to education year an internship in the hospital care also explained the variation in level of clinical reasoning. Together they explained 38% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intermediate nursing students were successfully assessed on their level of clinical reasoning in an education environment. The level of clinical reasoning could be explained by education year and number of days internship in the hospital care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104641
JournalNurse Education Today
Volume96
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assessment protocol
  • Clinical Judgment Rubric
  • Clinical reasoning
  • Dutch Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric
  • Explaination
  • Nursing students
  • Simulation setting

Cite this