TY - JOUR
T1 - Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Oosterveer, Daniëlla M.
AU - Arwert, Henk
AU - Terwee, Caroline B.
AU - Schoones, Jan W.
AU - Vlieland, Thea P. M. Vliet
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Purpose: Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Methods: Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Results: Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied. Conclusion: The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).
AB - Purpose: Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Methods: Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Results: Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied. Conclusion: The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).
KW - Interpretability
KW - Measurement properties
KW - PROMIS
KW - Patient-reported outcome measures
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Review
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130183671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35567674
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 31
SP - 3305
EP - 3315
JO - Quality of life research
JF - Quality of life research
IS - 12
ER -