TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring positive caregiving experiences in family caregivers of nursing home residents: A comparison of the Positive Experiences Scale, Gain in Alzheimer Care INstrument, and Positive Aspects of Caregiving questionnaire
AU - Smaling, Hanneke J. A.
AU - Joling, Karlijn J.
AU - Achterberg, Wilco P.
AU - Francke, Anneke L.
AU - van der Steen, Jenny T.
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank Giselka Gutschow and Celine Neefkes‐Zonneveld for their support in collecting the data, and Philip Yap for help with the translation of the GAIN. This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (grant number 733050302), Fonds NutsOhra (grant number 1405‐181), and University Network of the Care sector South Holland. Funding Information: We would like to thank Giselka Gutschow and Celine Neefkes-Zonneveld for their support in collecting the data, and Philip Yap for help with the translation of the GAIN. This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (grant number 733050302), Fonds NutsOhra (grant number 1405-181), and University Network of the Care sector South Holland. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Geriatrics & Gerontology International published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Geriatrics Society. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Aim: To compare the Positive Experiences Scale (PES), Gain in Alzheimer Care INstrument (GAIN) and Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC) in assessing positive caregiving experiences among caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia, and to explore which caregiver and care recipient characteristics relate to positive caregiving experiences. Methods: A total of 63 caregivers (mean age 59.2 years; SD 11.8) of nursing home residents with dementia from four Dutch nursing homes participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Internal consistency, convergent validity and user-friendliness (i.e. perception of item relevance and comprehensibility, ease of use, missing items, and user preference) were examined using Cronbach's alpha's, correlation coefficients and descriptive statistics, respectively. Results: The Cronbach's alpha for the GAIN, PAC and PES was 0.90, 0.94 and 0.68, respectively. The sum score of the PES showed a ceiling effect. Convergent validity was confirmed for all three instruments. The PES had the least missing data (mean number of missing items 0.2, SD 0.5) and was preferred by 40% of the caregivers, followed by the GAIN (mean number of missing items 0.6, SD 1.7, preferred by 11%). Positive caregiving experiences were negatively associated with educational level (range −0.28 to −0.35). Only the PES correlated positively with caregiver age (r = 0.25). Conclusions: All three questionnaires can be used to assess positive caregiving experiences, but the GAIN might be the most suitable questionnaire for caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. Further research is necessary to examine generalizability of the findings. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 636–643.
AB - Aim: To compare the Positive Experiences Scale (PES), Gain in Alzheimer Care INstrument (GAIN) and Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC) in assessing positive caregiving experiences among caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia, and to explore which caregiver and care recipient characteristics relate to positive caregiving experiences. Methods: A total of 63 caregivers (mean age 59.2 years; SD 11.8) of nursing home residents with dementia from four Dutch nursing homes participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Internal consistency, convergent validity and user-friendliness (i.e. perception of item relevance and comprehensibility, ease of use, missing items, and user preference) were examined using Cronbach's alpha's, correlation coefficients and descriptive statistics, respectively. Results: The Cronbach's alpha for the GAIN, PAC and PES was 0.90, 0.94 and 0.68, respectively. The sum score of the PES showed a ceiling effect. Convergent validity was confirmed for all three instruments. The PES had the least missing data (mean number of missing items 0.2, SD 0.5) and was preferred by 40% of the caregivers, followed by the GAIN (mean number of missing items 0.6, SD 1.7, preferred by 11%). Positive caregiving experiences were negatively associated with educational level (range −0.28 to −0.35). Only the PES correlated positively with caregiver age (r = 0.25). Conclusions: All three questionnaires can be used to assess positive caregiving experiences, but the GAIN might be the most suitable questionnaire for caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia. Further research is necessary to examine generalizability of the findings. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 636–643.
KW - caregivers
KW - dementia
KW - internal consistency
KW - nursing homes
KW - positive caregiving experiences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107947157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14210
DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14210
M3 - Article
C2 - 34132447
SN - 1444-1586
VL - 21
SP - 636
EP - 643
JO - Geriatrics & Gerontology International
JF - Geriatrics & Gerontology International
IS - 8
ER -