Mechanisms of Very Late Bioresorbable Scaffold Thrombosis: The INVEST Registry

Kyohei Yamaji, Yasushi Ueki, Geraud Souteyrand, Joost Daemen, Jens Wiebe, Holger Nef, Tom Adriaenssens, Joshua P. Loh, Benoit Lattuca, Joanna J. Wykrzykowska, Josep Gomez-Lara, Leo Timmers, Pascal Motreff, Petra Hoppmann, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Robert A. Byrne, Felix Meincke, Niklas Boeder, Benjamin Honton, Crochan J. O'SullivanAlfonso Ielasi, Nicolas Delarche, Günter Christ, Joe K. T. Lee, Michael Lee, Nicolas Amabile, Alexios Karagiannis, Stephan Windecker, Lorenz Räber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Very late scaffold thrombosis (VLScT) occurs more frequently after bioresorbable scaffold (Absorb BVS 1.1, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) implantation than with metallic everolimus-eluting stents. The purpose of this study was to elucidate mechanisms underlying VLScT as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The INVEST (Independent OCT Registry on Very Late Bioresorbable Scaffold Thrombosis) registry is an international consortium of investigators who used OCT to examine patients with VLScT. Between June 2013 and May 2017, 36 patients with 38 lesions who had VLScT underwent OCT at 19 centers. VLScT occurred at a median of 20 months (interquartile range: 16 to 27 months) after implantation. At the time of VLScT, 83% of patients received aspirin monotherapy and 17% received dual-antiplatelet therapy. The mechanisms underlying VLScT were (in descending order) scaffold discontinuity (42.1%), malapposition (18.4%), neoatherosclerosis (18.4%), underexpansion or scaffold recoil (10.5%), uncovered struts (5.3%), and edge-related disease progression (2.6%). Discontinuity (odds ratio [OR]: 110; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.5 to 173; p <0.001), malapposed struts (OR: 17.0; 95% CI: 14.8 to 19.7; p <0.001), and uncovered struts (OR: 7.3; 95% CI: 6.2 to 8.8; p <0.001) were more frequent in the thrombosed than the nonthrombosed scaffold regions. In 2 of 16 patients with scaffold discontinuity, intercurrent OCT before VLScT provided evidence of circularly apposed scaffold struts with minimal tissue coverage. The leading mechanism underlying VLScT was scaffold discontinuity, which suggests an unfavorable resorption-related process, followed by malapposition and neoatherosclerosis. It remains to be determined whether modifications in scaffold design and optimized implantation can mitigate the risk of VLScT. (Independent OCT Registry on Very Late Bioresorbable Scaffold Thrombosis [INVEST]; NCT03180931)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2330-2344
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume70
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Cite this