TY - JOUR
T1 - Midiendo la Resiliencia Psicológica
T2 - Traducción y Validación de la Versión China de la Escala de Evaluación de la Resiliencia (RES)
AU - Qing, Yulan
AU - Bakker, Anne
AU - van der Meer, Christianne A. I.
AU - te Brake, Hans
AU - Olff, Miranda
N1 - Funding Information: The first author Yulan Qing is financially supported by the China Scholarship Council for her PhD [grant number 201504910771]. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The Resilience Evaluation Scale (RES) is a novel and freely available measure of psychological resilience (factored into self-confidence and self-efficacy). To date, psychometric properties were evaluated in Dutch and American samples, but not yet in a Chinese sample. Objective: We aimed to validate the RES in a Chinese sample by examining its factor structure, reliability, and construct validity. Methods: The RES was translated into Chinese following a cross-cultural translation and adaptation procedure. Self-report questionnaires including the RES, exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTE's), the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and scales for conceptually related constructs of psychological resilience were then administered via an online survey. Results: In total, 484 Chinese adults (females, 66.9%; age: 27.33 ± 6.86 years) participated. Parallel analysis results suggested a one-factor structure for the Chinese RES. The Chinese RES demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Construct validity was demonstrated through significant associations with hypothesised related constructs and through a relation with lower levels of PTSD among the PTE-exposed subsample (n = 116) via the mediating role of avoidant coping strategies, i.e. behavioural disengagement and self-blame. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the RES is a reliable and valid assessment of psychological resilience to use in Chinese, in addition to its Dutch and English versions. The RES could potentially be adopted to measure psychological resilience in cross-cultural contexts.
AB - Background: The Resilience Evaluation Scale (RES) is a novel and freely available measure of psychological resilience (factored into self-confidence and self-efficacy). To date, psychometric properties were evaluated in Dutch and American samples, but not yet in a Chinese sample. Objective: We aimed to validate the RES in a Chinese sample by examining its factor structure, reliability, and construct validity. Methods: The RES was translated into Chinese following a cross-cultural translation and adaptation procedure. Self-report questionnaires including the RES, exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTE's), the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and scales for conceptually related constructs of psychological resilience were then administered via an online survey. Results: In total, 484 Chinese adults (females, 66.9%; age: 27.33 ± 6.86 years) participated. Parallel analysis results suggested a one-factor structure for the Chinese RES. The Chinese RES demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Construct validity was demonstrated through significant associations with hypothesised related constructs and through a relation with lower levels of PTSD among the PTE-exposed subsample (n = 116) via the mediating role of avoidant coping strategies, i.e. behavioural disengagement and self-blame. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the RES is a reliable and valid assessment of psychological resilience to use in Chinese, in addition to its Dutch and English versions. The RES could potentially be adopted to measure psychological resilience in cross-cultural contexts.
KW - Chinese
KW - Resilience evaluation scale (RES)
KW - potentially traumatic event (PTE)
KW - psychological resilience
KW - psychometric properties
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140841658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2133358
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2133358
M3 - Article
C2 - 36325258
SN - 2000-8198
VL - 13
JO - European journal of psychotraumatology
JF - European journal of psychotraumatology
IS - 2
M1 - 2133358
ER -