Misdiagnosis in multiple sclerosis in a Brazilian reference center: Clinical, radiological, laboratory profile and failures in the diagnostic process—Cohort study

Eduardo Macedo de Souza Tieppo, Guilherme Diogo Silva, Tomás Fraga Ferreira da Silva, Roger Santana de Araujo, Mateus Boaventura de Oliveira, Mariana Gondim Peixoto Spricigo, Gabriela Almeida Pimentel, Igor Gusmão Campana, Bruno Batitucci Castrillo, Natalia Trombini Mendes, Larissa Silva Teixeira, Douglas Mendes Nunes, Carolina de Medeiros Rimkus, Tarso Adoni, Samira Luisa Apóstolos Pereira, Dagoberto Callegaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis remains a problem despite the well-validated McDonald 2017. For proper evaluation of errors in the diagnostic process that lead to misdiagnosis, it is adequate to incorporate patients who are already under regular follow-up at reference centers of demyelinating diseases. Objectives: To evaluate multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in patients who are on follow-up at a reference center of demyelinating diseases in Brazil. Methods: We designed an observational study including patients in regular follow-up, who were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis at our specialized outpatient clinic in the Hospital of Clinics in the University of Sao Paulo, from 1996 to 2021, and were reassessed for misdiagnosis in 2022. We evaluated demographic information, clinical profile, and complementary exams and classified participants as “established multiple sclerosis,” “non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed,” and “non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed.” Failures in the diagnostic process were assessed by the modified Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research tool. Results: A total of 201 patients were included. After analysis, 191/201 (95.02%) participants were confirmed as “established multiple sclerosis,” 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as “non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed,” and 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as “non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed.” Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis persists in reference centers, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of clinical findings to prevent errors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1755-1764
Number of pages10
JournalMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume29
Issue number14
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • diagnostic error evaluation and research tool
  • failures in diagnostic process
  • misdiagnosis
  • misinterpretation of the magnetic resonance imaging
  • neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Cite this