Model‑Informed Precision Dosing to Reduce Vincristine‑Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Pediatric Patients: A Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation Analysis

Background: Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) is a common adverse effect of vincristine, a drug often used in pediatric oncology. Previous studies demonstrated large inter- and intrapatient variability in vincristine pharmacokinetics (PK). Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can be applied to calculate patient exposure and individualize dosing using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) measurements. This study set out to investigate the PK/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) relationship of VIPN and determine the utility of MIPD to support clinical decisions regarding dose selection and individualization. Methods: Data from 35 pediatric patients were utilized to quantify the relationship between vincristine dose, exposure and the development of VIPN. Measurements of vincristine exposure and VIPN (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) were available at baseline and for each subsequent dosing occasions (1–5). A PK and PKPD analysis was performed to assess the inter- and intraindividual variability in vincristine exposure and VIPN over time. In silico trials were performed to portray the utility of vincristine MIPD in pediatric subpopulations with a certain age, weight and cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 genotype distribution. Results: A two-compartmental model with linear PK provided a good description of the vincristine exposure data. Clearance and distribution parameters were related to bodyweight through allometric scaling. A proportional odds model with Markovian elements described the incidence of Grades 0, 1 and ≥ 2 VIPN overdosing occasions. Vincristine area under the curve (AUC) was the most significant exposure metric related to the development of VIPN, where an AUC of 50 ng⋅h/mL was estimated to be related to an average VIPN probability of 40% over five dosing occasions. The incidence of Grade ≥ 2 VIPN reduced from 62.1 to 53.9% for MIPD-based dosing compared with body surface area (BSA)-based dosing in patients. Dose decreases occurred in 81.4% of patients with MIPD (vs. 86.4% for standard dosing) and dose increments were performed in 33.4% of patients (no dose increments allowed for standard dosing). Conclusions: The PK and PKPD analysis supports the use of MIPD to guide clinical dose decisions and reduce the incidence of VIPN. The current work can be used to support decisions with respect to dose selection and dose individualization in children receiving vincristine.