Monogenic and Polygenic Contributions to Atrial Fibrillation Risk: Results from a National Biobank

Seung Hoan Choi, Sean J. Jurgens, Lu-Chen Weng, James P. Pirruccello, Carolina Roselli, Mark Chaffin, Christina J.-Y. Lee, Amelia W Hall, Amit V. Khera, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Steven A. Lubitz, Patrick T. Ellinor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Rationale:
Genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 genetic loci for atrial fibrillation (AF); recent work described an association between loss-of-function (LOF) variants in TTN and early-onset AF.

Objective:
We sought to determine the contribution of rare and common genetic variation to AF risk in the general population.

Methods:
The UK Biobank is a population-based study of 500 000 individuals including a subset with genome-wide genotyping and exome sequencing. In this case-control study, we included AF cases and controls of genetically determined white-European ancestry; analyses were performed using a logistic mixed-effects model adjusting for age, sex, the first 4 principal components of ancestry, empirical relationships, and case-control imbalance. An exome-wide, gene-based burden analysis was performed to examine the relationship between AF and rare, high-confidence LOF variants in genes with ≥10 LOF carriers. A polygenic risk score for AF was estimated using the LDpred algorithm. We then compared the contribution of AF polygenic risk score and LOF variants to AF risk.

Results:
The study included 1546 AF cases and 41 593 controls. In an analysis of 9099 genes with sufficient LOF variant carriers, a significant association between AF and rare LOF variants was observed in a single gene, TTN (odds ratio, 2.71, P=2.50×10−8). The association with AF was more significant (odds ratio, 6.15, P=3.26×10−14) when restricting to LOF variants located in exons highly expressed in cardiac tissue (TTNLOF). Overall, 0.44% of individuals carried TTNLOF variants, of whom 14% had AF. Among individuals in the highest 0.44% of the AF polygenic risk score only 9.3% had AF. In contrast, the AF polygenic risk score explained 4.7% of the variance in AF susceptibility, while TTNLOF variants only accounted for 0.2%.

Conclusions:
Both monogenic and polygenic factors contribute to AF risk in the general population. While rare TTNLOF variants confer a substantial AF penetrance, the additive effect of many common variants explains a larger proportion of genetic susceptibility to AF.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-209
JournalCirculation Research
Volume126
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Cite this