Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study

S. M. van Kuijk; D. H. Delahaije; C. D. Dirksen; H. C. Scheepers; M. E. Spaanderman; W. Ganzevoort; J. J. Duvekot; M. A. Oudijk; M. G. van Pampus; L. L. Peeters; L. J. Smits

doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310

Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study

S. M. van Kuijk, D. H. Delahaije, C. D. Dirksen, H. C. Scheepers, M. E. Spaanderman, W. Ganzevoort, J. J. Duvekot, M. A. Oudijk, M. G. van Pampus, L. L. Peeters, L. J. Smits

Obstetrics and Gynaecology (AMC)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact of using a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia to customize antenatal care in subsequent pregnancies. We compared care consumption, pregnancy outcomes, and self-reported health state of two risk-based subgroups, and compared these to a reference group receiving standard care. We included a total of 311 women from 12 hospitals. Compared to standard care, recurrence-risk guided care did not lead to different outcomes or self-perceived health. Our study exemplifies that recurrence-risk-based stratification of antenatal care in former preeclampsia patients is feasible; it does not lead to worse pregnancy outcomes

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	42-54
Journal	Hypertension in pregnancy
Volume	35
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310
Publication status	Published - 2016

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310

Cite this

van Kuijk, S. M., Delahaije, D. H., Dirksen, C. D., Scheepers, H. C., Spaanderman, M. E., Ganzevoort, W., Duvekot, J. J., Oudijk, M. A., van Pampus, M. G., Peeters, L. L., & Smits, L. J. (2016). Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study. Hypertension in pregnancy, 35(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310

@article{1153229285e74e698ef196eb406afd27,

title = "Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study",

abstract = "This study aims to determine the impact of using a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia to customize antenatal care in subsequent pregnancies. We compared care consumption, pregnancy outcomes, and self-reported health state of two risk-based subgroups, and compared these to a reference group receiving standard care. We included a total of 311 women from 12 hospitals. Compared to standard care, recurrence-risk guided care did not lead to different outcomes or self-perceived health. Our study exemplifies that recurrence-risk-based stratification of antenatal care in former preeclampsia patients is feasible; it does not lead to worse pregnancy outcomes",

author = "{van Kuijk}, {S. M.} and Delahaije, {D. H.} and Dirksen, {C. D.} and Scheepers, {H. C.} and Spaanderman, {M. E.} and W. Ganzevoort and Duvekot, {J. J.} and Oudijk, {M. A.} and {van Pampus}, {M. G.} and Peeters, {L. L.} and Smits, {L. J.}",

year = "2016",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "42--54",

journal = "Hypertension in pregnancy",

issn = "1064-1955",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

number = "1",

}

van Kuijk, SM, Delahaije, DH, Dirksen, CD, Scheepers, HC, Spaanderman, ME, Ganzevoort, W, Duvekot, JJ, Oudijk, MA, van Pampus, MG, Peeters, LL & Smits, LJ 2016, 'Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study', Hypertension in pregnancy, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 42-54. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study

AU - van Kuijk, S. M.

AU - Delahaije, D. H.

AU - Dirksen, C. D.

AU - Scheepers, H. C.

AU - Spaanderman, M. E.

AU - Ganzevoort, W.

AU - Duvekot, J. J.

AU - Oudijk, M. A.

AU - van Pampus, M. G.

AU - Peeters, L. L.

AU - Smits, L. J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This study aims to determine the impact of using a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia to customize antenatal care in subsequent pregnancies. We compared care consumption, pregnancy outcomes, and self-reported health state of two risk-based subgroups, and compared these to a reference group receiving standard care. We included a total of 311 women from 12 hospitals. Compared to standard care, recurrence-risk guided care did not lead to different outcomes or self-perceived health. Our study exemplifies that recurrence-risk-based stratification of antenatal care in former preeclampsia patients is feasible; it does not lead to worse pregnancy outcomes

AB - This study aims to determine the impact of using a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia to customize antenatal care in subsequent pregnancies. We compared care consumption, pregnancy outcomes, and self-reported health state of two risk-based subgroups, and compared these to a reference group receiving standard care. We included a total of 311 women from 12 hospitals. Compared to standard care, recurrence-risk guided care did not lead to different outcomes or self-perceived health. Our study exemplifies that recurrence-risk-based stratification of antenatal care in former preeclampsia patients is feasible; it does not lead to worse pregnancy outcomes

U2 - https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310

DO - https://doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310

M3 - Article

C2 - 26865192

SN - 1064-1955

VL - 35

SP - 42

EP - 54

JO - Hypertension in pregnancy

JF - Hypertension in pregnancy

IS - 1

ER -