Multiple Computer-based Methods of Measuring Joint Space Width Can Discriminate Between Treatment Arms in the COBRA Trial - Update of an Ongoing OMERACT Project

JT Sharp, J. Angwin, M. Boers, J. Duryea, A. Finckh, J.W. Hall, J.A. Kauffman, RB Landewe, G. Langs, C. Lukas, H.J.B. Moens, P. Peloschek, C.V. Strand, D.M. Van der Heijde, John T. Sharp, James R. Hall, Robert Landewé

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)


Previously reported data on 5 computer-based programs for measurement of joint space width focusing on discriminating ability and reproducibility are updated, showing new data. Four of 5 different programs for measuring joint space width were more discriminating than observer scoring for change in narrowing in the 12 months interval. Three of 4 programs were more discriminating than observer scoring for the 0-18 month interval. The program that failed to discriminate in the 0-12 month interval was not the same program that failed in the 0-18 month interval. The committee agreed at an interim meeting in November 2007 that an important goal for computer-based measurement programs is a 90% success rate in making measurements of joint pairs in followup studies. This means that the same joint must be measured in images of both timepoints in order to assess change over time in serial radiographs. None of the programs met this 90% threshold, but 3 programs achieved 85%-90% success rate. Intraclass correlation coefficients for assessing change in joint space width in individual joints were 0.98 or 0.99 for 4 programs. The smallest detectable change was <0.2 mm for 4 of the 5 programs, representing 29%-36% of the change within the 99th percentile of measurements
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1825-1828
JournalJournal of rheumatology
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this