NEURAPRO: A multi-centre RCT of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids versus placebo in young people at ultra-high risk of psychotic disorders - Medium-term follow-up and clinical course

B. Nelson, G. P. Amminger, H. P. Yuen, C. Markulev, S. Lavoie, M. R. Schäfer, J. A. Hartmann, N. Mossaheb, M. Schlögelhofer, S. Smesny, I. B. Hickie, G. Berger, E. Y. H. Chen, L. de Haan, D. H. Nieman, M. Nordentoft, A. Riecher-Rössler, S. Verma, A. Thompson, A. R. YungP. D. McGorry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reports a medium-term follow-up of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) patients. Primary outcomes of interest were transition to psychosis and symptomatic and functional outcome. A secondary aim was to investigate clinical predictors of medium-term outcome. Three hundred four UHR participants were recruited across 10 specialised early psychosis services in Australia, Asia, and Europe. The intervention consisted of 1.4 g/daily of omega-3 PUFA or placebo, plus up to 20 sessions of cognitive-behavioural case management (CBCM), over the 6-month study period, with participants receiving further CBCM sessions on basis of need between months 6-12. Mean time to follow-up was 3.4 (median = 3.3; SD = 0.9) years. There was a modest increase in transitions between 12-month and medium-term follow-up (11-13%) and substantial improvement in symptoms and functioning between baseline and follow-up, with no differences between the treatment groups. Most improvement had been achieved by end of the intervention. 55% of the sample received mental health treatment between end of intervention and follow-up. Omega-3 PUFA did not provide additional benefits to good quality psychosocial intervention over the medium term. Although most improvement had been achieved by end of intervention the substantial rates of post-intervention mental health service use indicate longer-term clinical need in UHR patients. The post-intervention phase treatment or the longer-term effect of CBCM, or a combination of the two, may have contributed to maintaining the gains achieved during the intervention phase and prevented significant deterioration after this time.
Original languageEnglish
Article number11
Journalnpj Schizophrenia
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this