Neurodevelopmental outcomes at five years after early-onset fetal growth restriction: Analyses in a Dutch subgroup participating in a European management trial

A. Pels, O. C. Knaven, B. J. Wijnberg-Williams, M. J. C. Eijsermans, S. M. Mulder-de Tollenaer, C. S. H. Aarnoudse-Moens, C. Koopman-Esseboom, J. van Eyck, J. B. Derks, W. Ganzevoort, A. G. van Wassenaer-Leemhuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore developmental outcomes at five years after early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR). Study design: Retrospective data analysis of prospective follow-up of patients of three Dutch centres, who participated in a twenty centre European randomized controlled trial on timing of delivery in early-onset FGR. Developmental outcome of very preterm infants born after extreme FGR is assessed at (corrected) age of five. Results: Seventy-four very preterm FGR children underwent follow-up at the age of five. Mean gestational age at birth was 30 weeks and birth weight was 910 g, 7% had a Bayley score <85 at two years. Median five years’ FSIQ was 97, 16% had a FSIQ < 85, and 35% had one or more IQ scores <85. Motor score ≤ 7 on movement ABC-II (M-ABC-II-NL) was seen in 38%. Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow, gestational age at delivery, birthweight and neonatal morbidity were related to an FSIQ < 85. Any abnormal IQ scale score was related to birthweight, male sex and severity of FGR, and abnormal motor score to male sex and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Conclusions: Overall, median cognitive outcome at five years was within normal range, but 35% of the children had any abnormal IQ score at age five, depending on the IQ measure, and motor impairment was seen in 38% of the children. GA at delivery, birthweight, EDF prior to delivery and neonatal morbidity were the most important risk factors for cognitive outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-70
JournalEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
Volume234
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this