Noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status in patients after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation

Sebastian Roth, Henrik Fox, René M'Pembele, Michiel Morshuis, Giovanna Lurati Buse, Markus W. Hollmann, Ragnar Huhn, Thomas Bitter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamic assessment is crucial after heart transplantation (HTX) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Gold-standard is invasive assessment via thermodilution (TD). Noninvasive pulse contour analysis (NPCA) is a new technology that is supposed to determine hemodynamics completely noninvasive. We aimed to validate this technology in HTX and LVAD patients and conducted a prospective single-center cohort study. METHODS: Patients after HTX or LVAD implantation underwent right heart catheterization including TD. NPCA using the CNAP Monitor (V.5.2.14; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) was performed simultaneously. Three TD measurements were compared with simultaneous NPCA measurements for hemodynamic assessment. To describe the agreement between TD and NPCA, Bland-Altman analysis was done. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients were prospectively enrolled (HTX: n = 10, LVAD: n = 18). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of +1.05 l/min (limits of agreement ± 4.09 l/min, percentage error 62.1%) for cardiac output (CO). In LVAD patients, no adequate NPCA signal could be obtained. In 5 patients (27.8%), any NPCA signal could be detected, but was considered as low signal quality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, according to our limited data in a small cohort of HTX and LVAD patients, NPCA using the CNAP Monitor seems not to be suitable for noninvasive evaluation of the hemodynamic status.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0275977
Pages (from-to)e0275977
JournalPLOS ONE
Volume17
Issue number10 October
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Cite this