Normative modelling of brain morphometry across the lifespan with CentileBrain: algorithm benchmarking and model optimisation

Ruiyang Ge, Yuetong Yu, Yi Xuan Qi, Dorret I. Boomsma, Eveline A. Crone, Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol, Neda Jahanshad, Paul M. Thompson, Sophia Frangou, ENIGMA Lifespan Working Group, Dennis van 't Ent

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The value of normative models in research and clinical practice relies on their robustness and a systematic comparison of different modelling algorithms and parameters; however, this has not been done to date. We aimed to identify the optimal approach for normative modelling of brain morphometric data through systematic empirical benchmarking, by quantifying the accuracy of different algorithms and identifying parameters that optimised model performance. We developed this framework with regional morphometric data from 37 407 healthy individuals (53% female and 47% male; aged 3–90 years) from 87 datasets from Europe, Australia, the USA, South Africa, and east Asia following a comparative evaluation of eight algorithms and multiple covariate combinations pertaining to image acquisition and quality, parcellation software versions, global neuroimaging measures, and longitudinal stability. The multivariate fractional polynomial regression (MFPR) emerged as the preferred algorithm, optimised with non-linear polynomials for age and linear effects of global measures as covariates. The MFPR models showed excellent accuracy across the lifespan and within distinct age-bins and longitudinal stability over a 2-year period. The performance of all MFPR models plateaued at sample sizes exceeding 3000 study participants. This model can inform about the biological and behavioural implications of deviations from typical age-related neuroanatomical changes and support future study designs. The model and scripts described here are freely available through CentileBrain.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e211-e221
JournalThe Lancet Digital Health
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2024

Cite this