Nudging plant-based alternatives to meat and dairy in a real-life online supermarket: A randomized controlled trial

Nina van der Vliet, Josine M Stuber, Sanne Raghoebar, Eline Roordink, Koen van der Swaluw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A shift from predominantly animal-based to plant-based consumption can benefit both planetary and public health. Nudging may help to promote such a shift. This study investigated nudge effects on plant-based alternatives to meat and dairy in an online supermarket. We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled real-life online supermarket trial. Each customer transaction was randomized to a control arm (regular online supermarket) or an intervention arm (addition of placement, hedonic property and dynamic social norm nudges promoting meat and dairy alternatives). Outcomes were the aggregate of meat and dairy alternative purchases (primary outcome), the number of meat purchases, dairy purchases, meat alternative purchases, and dairy alternative purchases (secondary), and retailer revenue (tertiary). Generalized linear mixed models with a Conway-Maxwell Poisson distribution were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Analyzed data included 8488 transactions by participants (n = 4266 control arm, n = 4222 intervention arm), out of which 2411 (66%) were aged above 45 years, 5660 (67%) were females, and 1970 (23%) lived in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods. Intervention arm participants purchased 10% (IRR 1.10 (95% CI 0.99-1.23)) more meat and dairy alternatives and 16% (1.16 (0.99-1.36)) more meat alternatives than control arm participants, although these findings are not statistically significant. There was no difference in dairy alternative purchases (1.00 (0.90-1.10)). Intervention arm participants purchased 3% less meats (0.97 (0.93-1.02)) and 2% less dairy products (0.98 (0.95-1.02)) than control participants. Retailer revenue was not affected (0.98 (0.95-1.01)). Online nudging strategies alone did not lead to a statistically significant higher amount of plant-based purchases, but replication of this work is needed with increased study power. Future studies should also consider nudging strategies as part of a broader set of policies to promote plant-based purchases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on 14th of May 2022. ISRCTN16569242 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16569242).

Original languageEnglish
Article number107278
Pages (from-to)107278
JournalAppetite
Volume196
Early online date17 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2024

Keywords

  • Choice architecture
  • Consumer decisions
  • Grocery store
  • Point of purchase
  • Protein transition
  • Sustainable

Cite this