TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing actigraphic estimates of polysomnographic sleep features in insomnia disorder
AU - te Lindert, Bart H.W.
AU - van der Meijden, Wisse P.
AU - Wassing, Rick
AU - Lakbila-Kamal, Oti
AU - Wei, Yishul
AU - van Someren, Eus J.W.
AU - Ramautar, Jennifer R.
N1 - Copyright publisher: Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Study Objectives: Actigraphy is a useful tool for estimating sleep, but less accurately distinguishes sleep and wakefulness in patients with insomnia disorder (ID) than in good sleepers. Specific algorithm parameter settings have been suggested to improve the accuracy of actigraphic estimates of sleep onset or nocturnal sleep and wakefulness in ID. However, a direct comparison of how different algorithm parameter settings affect actigraphic estimates of sleep features has been lacking. This study aimed to define the optimal algorithm parameter settings for actigraphic estimates of polysomnographic sleep features in people suffering from ID and matched good sleepers. Methods: We simultaneously recorded actigraphy and polysomnography without sleep diaries during 210 laboratory nights of people with ID (n = 58) and matched controls (CTRL) without sleep complaints (n = 56). We analyzed cross-validation errors using 150 algorithm parameter configurations and Bland-Altman plots of sleep features using the optimal settings. Results: Optimal sleep onset latency and total sleep time (TST) errors were lower in CTRL (8.9 ± 2.1 and 16.5 ± 2.1 min, respectively) than in ID (11.7 ± 0.8 and 29.1 ± 3.4 min). The sleep-wake algorithm, a period duration of 5 min, and a wake sensitivity threshold of 40 achieved optimal results in ID and near-optimal results in CTRL. Bland-Altman plots were nearly identical for ID and controls for all common all-night sleep features except for TST. Conclusion: This systematic evaluation shows that actigraphic sleep feature estimation can be improved by using uncommon parameter settings. One specific parameter setting provides (near-)optimal estimation of sleep onset and nocturnal sleep across ID and controls. Statement of Significance Actigraphy distinguishes sleep and wakefulness less well in insomnia disorder (ID) than in good sleepers. Evaluation of a wide range of parameter settings revealed that actigraphic estimates can be improved. Optimal settings differed between people with ID and good sleepers. With minimal loss of accuracy, however, a single configuration can be recommended for use across good sleepers and people with ID.
AB - Study Objectives: Actigraphy is a useful tool for estimating sleep, but less accurately distinguishes sleep and wakefulness in patients with insomnia disorder (ID) than in good sleepers. Specific algorithm parameter settings have been suggested to improve the accuracy of actigraphic estimates of sleep onset or nocturnal sleep and wakefulness in ID. However, a direct comparison of how different algorithm parameter settings affect actigraphic estimates of sleep features has been lacking. This study aimed to define the optimal algorithm parameter settings for actigraphic estimates of polysomnographic sleep features in people suffering from ID and matched good sleepers. Methods: We simultaneously recorded actigraphy and polysomnography without sleep diaries during 210 laboratory nights of people with ID (n = 58) and matched controls (CTRL) without sleep complaints (n = 56). We analyzed cross-validation errors using 150 algorithm parameter configurations and Bland-Altman plots of sleep features using the optimal settings. Results: Optimal sleep onset latency and total sleep time (TST) errors were lower in CTRL (8.9 ± 2.1 and 16.5 ± 2.1 min, respectively) than in ID (11.7 ± 0.8 and 29.1 ± 3.4 min). The sleep-wake algorithm, a period duration of 5 min, and a wake sensitivity threshold of 40 achieved optimal results in ID and near-optimal results in CTRL. Bland-Altman plots were nearly identical for ID and controls for all common all-night sleep features except for TST. Conclusion: This systematic evaluation shows that actigraphic sleep feature estimation can be improved by using uncommon parameter settings. One specific parameter setting provides (near-)optimal estimation of sleep onset and nocturnal sleep across ID and controls. Statement of Significance Actigraphy distinguishes sleep and wakefulness less well in insomnia disorder (ID) than in good sleepers. Evaluation of a wide range of parameter settings revealed that actigraphic estimates can be improved. Optimal settings differed between people with ID and good sleepers. With minimal loss of accuracy, however, a single configuration can be recommended for use across good sleepers and people with ID.
KW - Actigraphy
KW - Insomnia
KW - Polysomnography
KW - Sensitivity
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096884307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096884307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa090
DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa090
M3 - Article
C2 - 32648912
SN - 0161-8105
VL - 43
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - SLEEP
JF - SLEEP
IS - 11
M1 - zsaa090
ER -