Outcome measures and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from research to clinical practice

Jeffrey A. Allen, Filip Eftimov, Luis Querol

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated syndrome characterized clinically by weakness and/or numbness that evolves over 2 months or more. The heterogeneity of clinical features necessitates an individualized approach to disease monitoring that takes lessons learned from clinical trials and applies them to clinical practice. Areas covered: This review discusses the importance of clinimetrics and biomarkers in CIDP diagnosis and disease monitoring. Highlighted are the challenges of defining responses to immunotherapy, the usefulness, and limitations of utilizing evidence-based clinical outcome measures during routine clinical care, and the evolving understanding of how diagnostic and disease activity biomarkers may reshape our treatment and disease monitoring paradigms. Expert opinion: Although disability and impairment outcome measures are commonly used in CIDP to indicate disease status, the nonspecific nature of these metrics limits the ability to attribute a change in any given metric to a change in CIDP. This interpretive challenge may be magnified by inconsistencies in the direction of change as well as a strong placebo effect. There is a need to improve our understanding of minimally important changes in existing outcome measures as a means to personalize treatment and to better assess disease activity status with biomarker discovery.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-816
Number of pages12
JournalExpert review of neurotherapeutics
Volume21
Issue number7
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
  • biomarkers
  • clinical outcome measures
  • diagnosis
  • disability
  • disease activity
  • impairment
  • minimal clinically important difference

Cite this