Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Stroke Care: A Systematic Review

Cosette Cornelis, Sanne J. den Hartog, Carla M. Bastemeijer, Bob Roozenbeek, Paul J. Nederkoorn, Renske M. van den Berg-Vos

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) assess patients' perception of health care. We aimed to identify all reported PREMs for stroke care and critically appraise psychometric properties of PREMs validated for patients with stroke. METHODS: Studies on the development, validation, or utilization of PREMs for adult patients with stroke were systematically identified. The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments criteria were used to appraise psychometric performance. RESULTS: We included 18 studies, examining 13 PREMs. Two PREMs had been developed for stroke care: Consumer Quality Index: Cerebrovascular Accident and Riksstroke. Consumer Quality Index: Cerebrovascular Accident was given a positive psychometric assessment, but its length and limited language applicability impede clinical implementation. Riksstroke was appraised as doubtful. Eleven PREMs were generic. The psychometric performance of 5 generic PREMS, validated for patients with stroke, received conflicting assessments. Six generic PREMs had not been validated in patients with stroke and were therefore not assessed for instrument performance. CONCLUSIONS: Thirteen PREMs have been published for use in stroke care. The stroke-specific Consumer Quality Index: Cerebrovascular Accident has favorable psychometric performance but lacks practical feasibility. Other PREMs have inadequate or unknown psychometric properties. This indicates the need for developing stroke-specific PREMs to support quality improvement and enhance patient-centered care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2432-2435
Number of pages4
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021


  • patient-centered care
  • psychometric
  • quality improvement
  • stroke
  • systematic review

Cite this