Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to personalise follow-up care of ovarian cancer: what do patients think? A qualitative interview study

Dachel D. Seeratan, Robin G. van Schuylenburch, Luc R.C.W. van Lonkhuijzen, Johanna W.M. Aarts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore ovarian cancer patients’ preferences regarding follow-up care and, in particular, the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as an approach to personalise follow-up care. Methods: Between May and June 2021, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ovarian cancer patients, who had finished their primary treatment at least 6 months prior and were receiving follow-up care at our centre. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. A thematic flow chart was created describing interacting themes. Results: Seventeen patients were interviewed, of which 11 were familiar with PROMs. Two key themes emerged from the data: the need for reassurance and the wish for personalised care. A follow-up scheme using PROMs was identified as a separate theme with the potential to personalise care. Several barriers and facilitators of PROMs were mentioned. Conclusions: Ovarian cancer patients have a desire for personalised follow-up care and seek reassurance. PROMs may be able to support both of these needs. Future research is needed to determine the most effective, patient-centred way to implement them. Implications for cancer survivors: By understanding what patients’ preferences are regarding follow-up care, more initiatives can be set up to personalise follow-up care, through which patient anxiety and dissatisfaction can be reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Article number247
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Follow-up care
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
  • Qualitative interview
  • Quality of life

Cite this