Patients non-responding to etanercept obtain lower etanercept concentrations compared with responding patients

A. Jamnitski, C. L. Krieckaert, M. T. Nurmohamed, M. H. Hart, B. A. Dijkmans, L. Aarden, A. E. Voskuyl, G. J. Wolbink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between serum etanercept levels and clinical response. Methods: In 292 etanercept-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis clinical and pharmacological data were determined at baseline and after 1, 4 and 6 months of etanercept treatment. Differences in etanercept levels between good, moderate and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) non-responders were assessed after 6 months of therapy. Results: After 6 months of therapy etanercept levels were significantly higher in good responders (median (IQR) 3.78 (2.53-5.17)) compared with both moderate 3.10 (2.12-4.47) and EULAR non-responders 2.80 (1.27-3.93) (all p<0.05). There was a significant association between clinical response and serum etanercept levels (regression coefficient 0.54, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.86, p=0.001). When patients were categorised into quartiles according to the height of etanercept levels, the lowest quartile (etanercept level <2.1 mg/l) comprised 40% of all non-responders. The highest quartile (etanercept level >4.7 mg/l) comprised 35% of all good EULAR responders. Anti-etanercept antibodies were detected in none of the sera. Conclusion: The authors demonstrated that lower etanercept levels were associated with non-response. Therapeutic drug monitoring and the possibility of the adjusted dosing regimes in the selected groups of patients should be investigated further as a possible tool to optimise treatment with etanercept.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-91
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of the rheumatic diseases
Volume71
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Cite this