Patients' preferences for secondary prevention following a coronary event

Tinka J. van Trier, Harald T. Jørstad, Wilma J. M. Scholte op Reimer, Madoka Sunamura, Nienke ter Hoeve, G. Aernout Somsen, Ron J. G. Peters, Marjolein Snaterse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Despite clear evidence on the effectiveness of secondary prevention, patients with coronary artery disease frequently fail to reach guideline-based risk factor targets. Integrating patients’ preferences into treatment decisions has been recommended to reduce this gap. However, this requires knowledge about patient treatment preferences. Therefore, through a survey study, we aimed to explore which risk factors patients self-perceived, prioritised for improvement, and needed support with after a recent hospitalisation for coronary heart disease. Methods: A digital questionnaire was presented to patients > 18 years recently discharged (≤3 months) from an acute coronary care unit in the Netherlands (Europe). Patients could select from eight cardiovascular risk factors that they (1) self-perceived, (2) prioritised for improvement, and (3) needed support to improve. Patients’ perceived risk factors were compared to those documented in the medical records. Results: Respondents (N = 254, 26 % women), mean age 64 (SD 10) years, identified ‘physical inactivity’ more frequently than their medical records (140 patients vs. 91 records, p < 0.001), while three other risk factors were reported with equal and four with lower frequency. ‘Physical inactivity’, ‘overweight’ and ‘stress’ were most frequently prioritised for improvement (82 %, 88 % and 78 %) and professional support (64 %, 50 % and 58 %), with 87 % preferring lifestyle optimisation if this would reduce drug use. Conclusions: Patients with a recent coronary event show significant disparities in identifying risk factors compared to their medical records. They tend to prefer improving lifestyle- over drug-modifiable risk factors, particularly physical inactivity, overweight and stress, and indicate the need for support in improving these factors.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102681
JournalPreventive medicine reports
Volume40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Lifestyle
  • Patient preferences
  • Rehabilitation
  • Risk factors

Cite this