Pendra goes Dutch; lessons for the CE mark in Europe

J. H. DeVries, I. M. E. Wentholt, A. Zwart, J. B. Hoekstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of a truly non-invasive continuous glucose sensor is an elusive goal. We describe the rise and fall of the Pendra device. In 2000 the company Pendragon Medical introduced a truly non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device. This system was based on impedance spectroscopy. Pendra was CE approved in May 2003. For a short time, the Pendra was available on the Dutch direct to consumer market. A post-marketing reliability study was performed in 6 type l diabetes patients. Mean Absolute Difference between Pendra glucose values and values obtained through self monitoring of blood glucose was 52%, the Pearson's correlation coefficient was 35.1% and a Clark Error grid showed 4.3% of the Pendra readings in the potentially dangerous zone E. We argue that the CE certification process for continuous glucose sensors should be made more transparent, and that a consensus on specific requirements for continuous glucose sensors is needed, to prevent patients from exposure to potentially dangerous situations. This manuscript is a shortened and adapted version of Wentholt IM, Zwart A, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH. Pendra goes Dutch; lessons for the CE mark in Europe. Diabetologia 2005; 48: 1055-8 and is published with consent of the editor of Diabetologia. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S93-S96
JournalDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Volume74
Issue numberSuppl. 2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Cite this