Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results from A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications

Rami S. Kantar, Corstiaan C. Breugem, Allyson R. Alfonso, Kristen Keith, Serena Kassam, Beyhan Annan, Elsa M. Chahine, Philip J. Wasicek, Krishna G. Patel, Roberto L. Flores, Usama S. Hamdan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction We analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries. Methods Data were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses. Results The total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38). Conclusions Our study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-198
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Plastic Surgery
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • capacity building
  • cleft
  • cleft lip
  • cleft palate
  • cleft surgery
  • craniomaxillofacial
  • education
  • global health
  • global surgery
  • surgical education

Cite this