Perception of quality of intraoperative fluoroscopy and the influence on postoperative management: an international survey

Florian Oehme, Konrad Schütze, Björn Christian Link, Herman Frima, Tim Schepers, Steven Rhemrev, Mark Rickman, Reto Babst, Frank Joseph Paulus Beeres

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Intraoperative precise visualization of fractures and assessment of the quality of reduction is essential in orthopedic trauma surgery. Fluoroscopic skills will lead to an increased detection rate of minimal abnormalities needing revision intraoperatively. The definition of fluoroscopic skills and the interpretation of acceptable “minimal abnormalities” remains somehow unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the subjective quality assessment of intraoperative radiographs (IR) and whether they are influenced by cultural and demographic factors. Furthermore, we aimed to answer the question whether the indication for revision surgery is international comparable or rather influenceable by cultural aspects. Methods: Intraoperative radiographs of 30 patients operated for an ankle or radius fracture were selected for an international survey. In total, 22 patients were randomly selected from an already existing database and eligible for inclusion if reduction was accomplished during initial operation without planed revision. Eight patients of this group had undergone an unplanned revision surgery (26.6%). Fifteen orthopedic trauma surgeons from three different countries answered this survey. All raters were senior consultants. Results: The quality of reduction was rated as good in both the AP (7.95 of 10) and lateral (7.84 of 10) views. The inter-observer reliability was substantially weaker in Country B (kappa of 0.23) compared to Countries A (p value < 0.05) and C (range 0.33–0.43). In only 33% of the cases the raters requested a postoperative radiograph. This was significantly fewer (p value < 0.001) in Country A. The frequency of postoperative requested CT’s was comparable between the countries. Conclusion: This study showed acceptable IR assessment in terms of quality rating. Furthermore, it revealed substantial differences in the postoperative decision-making process in different countries, especially regarding the necessity for postoperative radiographs. This suggests that definition for indication of revision surgery is culturally influenced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1073-1079
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery
Volume47
Issue number4
Early online date20 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Ankle fracture
  • Intraoperative c-arm quality
  • Intraoperative fluoroscopy
  • Radius fracture
  • Survey

Cite this