Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

3 Citations (Scopus)

Access to Document

@article{4ceedc01182a4aa290e05cadfa72b8ff,

title = "Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion",

author = "Engstr{\"o}m, {Annemarie E.} and Sjauw, {Krischan D.} and Henriques, {Jos{\'e} P. S.}",

year = "2010",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp523",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "502",

journal = "European Heart journal",

issn = "0195-668X",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock: evidence under construction vs. expert opinion

AU - Engström, Annemarie E.

AU - Sjauw, Krischan D.

AU - Henriques, José P. S.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp523

DO - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp523

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 19952005

SN - 0195-668X

VL - 31

SP - 502

JO - European Heart journal

JF - European Heart journal

IS - 4

ER -