Perioperative assessment of left ventricular function by pressure-volume loops using the conductance catheter method

Sven A. F. Tulner, Robert J. M. Klautz, Gerda L. van Rijk-Zwikker, Frank H. M. Engbers, Jeroen J. Bax, Jan Baan, Ernst E. van der Wall, Robert A. Dion, Paul Steendijk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of perioperative measurements of cardiac function during cardiac surgery is complicated by changes in loading conditions induced by anesthesia, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and the surgical procedure itself. Quantification of left ventricular (LV) function by pressure-volume relations as obtained by the conductance catheter would be advantageous because load-independent indices can be determined. Accordingly, we evaluated methodological aspects of the conductance-catheter technique and documented LV function before and after CPB in eight patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. LV pressure-volume loops by transesophageal echocardiography-guided transaortic application of the conductance catheter were obtained at steady-state and during preload reduction by temporary occlusion of the inferior cava. All patients remained hemodynamically stable, and no complications occurred. Complete data were acquired within 15 min before and after CPB, Cardiac output (5.2 ± 1.3 L/min to 6.0 ± 1.4 L/min) and LV ejection fraction (46% ± 17% to 48% ± 19%) did not change, but end-diastolic pressure increased significantly after CPB (8 ± 2 mm Hg to 16 ± 7 mm Hg; P < 0.05). Load-independent systolic indices remained constant (end-systolic elastance: 1.31 ± 1.20 mm Hg/mL to 1.13 ± 0.59 mm Hg/mL). Diastolic function changed significantly after CPB, as the relaxation time constant decreased from 64 ± 6 ms to 52 ± 5 ms (P < 0.05) and the chamber stiffness constant increased from 0.016 ± 0.014/mL to 0.038 ± 0.016/mL (P < 0.05). We conclude that the conductance catheter method provides detailed data on perioperative myocardial function and may be useful for evaluating the effects of new surgical and anesthetic procedures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)950-957
JournalAnesthesia and analgesia
Volume97
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Cite this