TY - JOUR
T1 - Periprosthetic femoral nonunions treated with internal fixation and bone grafting
AU - Prins, Jonne
AU - Donders, Johanna C. E.
AU - Helfet, David L.
AU - Wellman, David S.
AU - Klinger, Craig E.
AU - Redko, Mariya
AU - Kloen, Peter
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Introduction: Periprosthetic femoral nonunions (PPFN) have a reported incidence of 3–9%. Literature on PPFN management is scarce. The study aim was to review combined results of two academic teaching hospitals using comparable PPFN treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients treated for a PPFN between February 2005 and December 2016. All patients treated with internal fixation for a PPFN with complete clinical and radiological follow-up until healing were included. Nineteen patients were identified (mean age 71.2 years, range 49–87). Treatment consisted of failed hardware removal, debridement, reduction, and rigid internal fixation with or without bone graft. For revision PPFN surgery, use of dual-plating and bone graft augmentation was common. Results: Eighteen of 19 patients (94.7%) progressed to osseous union. One patient was converted to a total femoral prosthesis. No patients were lost to follow-up. All were ambulatory at last follow-up and mean follow-up was 39.8 months. Fourteen patients (73.7%) united after our index nonunion surgery at mean 9.8 months. Five patients (26.3%) required revision surgery after our index nonunion treatment and in 4 of these cases union was achieved at mean 18.0 months. Conclusions: Our results suggest debridement, revision of fixation and liberal use of bone grafting can lead to reliable healing in the majority of PPFNs. For those PPFNs that do not heal following initial treatment, good healing potential persists with an additional procedure. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.
AB - Introduction: Periprosthetic femoral nonunions (PPFN) have a reported incidence of 3–9%. Literature on PPFN management is scarce. The study aim was to review combined results of two academic teaching hospitals using comparable PPFN treatment strategies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients treated for a PPFN between February 2005 and December 2016. All patients treated with internal fixation for a PPFN with complete clinical and radiological follow-up until healing were included. Nineteen patients were identified (mean age 71.2 years, range 49–87). Treatment consisted of failed hardware removal, debridement, reduction, and rigid internal fixation with or without bone graft. For revision PPFN surgery, use of dual-plating and bone graft augmentation was common. Results: Eighteen of 19 patients (94.7%) progressed to osseous union. One patient was converted to a total femoral prosthesis. No patients were lost to follow-up. All were ambulatory at last follow-up and mean follow-up was 39.8 months. Fourteen patients (73.7%) united after our index nonunion surgery at mean 9.8 months. Five patients (26.3%) required revision surgery after our index nonunion treatment and in 4 of these cases union was achieved at mean 18.0 months. Conclusions: Our results suggest debridement, revision of fixation and liberal use of bone grafting can lead to reliable healing in the majority of PPFNs. For those PPFNs that do not heal following initial treatment, good healing potential persists with an additional procedure. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055184886&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366829
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.019
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 30366829
SN - 0020-1383
VL - 49
SP - 2295
EP - 2301
JO - Injury
JF - Injury
IS - 12
ER -