Physical Function and Quality of Life After Resection of Mobile Spine Chondrosarcoma

Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira, Stein J. Janssen, Nicky Stoop, Stefan Hartveldt, Yen-Lin E. Chen, Thomas F. DeLaney, Francis J. Hornicek, Joseph H. Schwab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: (1) To assess patient-reported outcomes—physical function, pain, and quality of life—in patients who underwent resection of a mobile spine chondrosarcoma. (2) To assess complications (90 days), readmissions, reoperations, oncological outcomes, and neurologic status. Methods: Thirty-three patients with spinal conventional chondrosarcoma resection between 1984 and 2014 at one hospital were included. The primary outcome measures were—minimally 6 months after surgery—the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ5D), PROMIS–Physical Function, PROMIS–Pain Intensity, and Oswestry (ODI) Disability Index, or Neck (NDI) Disability established in 14 out of 20 alive (70.0%) patients. Complications, readmission, reoperations, oncological outcomes, and neurological status were reported for the complete cohort of 33 patients. Results: After spine chondrosarcoma resection, patients (n = 14) reported worse physical function (median 43, range 22-61, P =.026), worse quality of life (median EQ5D 0.70, range 0.04-1, P =.022), and comparable pain intensity (median 47, range 31-56, P =.362) when compared with US general population values. The median NDI/ODI was 25 (range 0-72) indicating mild to moderate disability. Patients undergoing reoperation had worse patient-reported outcomes than those who did not. Eighteen (55.5%) out of 33 patients suffered complications (90 days), 14 (42.4%) had unplanned readmission, and 13 (39.4%) underwent reoperation. Intralesional resection was associated with increased readmission, reoperation, and recurrence rate. Conclusions: Chondrosarcoma affects quality of life and physical function and its treatment frequently results in complications and reoperations. Our findings can be used to inform future patients about expected outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)743-753
Number of pages11
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Cite this