TY - JOUR
T1 - Polyp Morphology: An Interobserver Evaluation for the Paris Classification Among International Experts
AU - van Doorn, Sascha C.
AU - Hazewinkel, Y.
AU - East, James E.
AU - van Leerdam, Monique E.
AU - Rastogi, Amit
AU - Pellisé, Maria
AU - Sanduleanu-Dascalescu, Silvia
AU - Bastiaansen, Barbara A. J.
AU - Fockens, Paul
AU - Dekker, Evelien
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - OBJECTIVES: The Paris classification is an international classification system for describing polyp morphology. Thus far, the validity and reproducibility of this classification have not been assessed. We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement for the Paris classification among seven Western expert endoscopists. METHODS: A total of 85 short endoscopic video clips depicting polyps were created and assessed by seven expert endoscopists according to the Paris classification. After a digital training module, the same 85 polyps were assessed again. We calculated the interobserver agreement with a Fleiss kappa and as the proportion of pairwise agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement of the Paris classification among seven experts was moderate with a Fleiss kappa of 0.42 and a mean pairwise agreement of 67%. The proportion of lesions assessed as "flat" by the experts ranged between 13 and 40% (P <0.001). After the digital training, the interobserver agreement did not change (kappa 0.38, pairwise agreement 60%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to validate the Paris classification for polyp morphology. We demonstrated only a moderate interobserver agreement among international Western experts for this classification system. Our data suggest that, in its current version, the use of this classification system in daily practice is questionable and it is unsuitable for comparative endoscopic research. We therefore suggest introduction of a simplification of the classification system
AB - OBJECTIVES: The Paris classification is an international classification system for describing polyp morphology. Thus far, the validity and reproducibility of this classification have not been assessed. We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement for the Paris classification among seven Western expert endoscopists. METHODS: A total of 85 short endoscopic video clips depicting polyps were created and assessed by seven expert endoscopists according to the Paris classification. After a digital training module, the same 85 polyps were assessed again. We calculated the interobserver agreement with a Fleiss kappa and as the proportion of pairwise agreement. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement of the Paris classification among seven experts was moderate with a Fleiss kappa of 0.42 and a mean pairwise agreement of 67%. The proportion of lesions assessed as "flat" by the experts ranged between 13 and 40% (P <0.001). After the digital training, the interobserver agreement did not change (kappa 0.38, pairwise agreement 60%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to validate the Paris classification for polyp morphology. We demonstrated only a moderate interobserver agreement among international Western experts for this classification system. Our data suggest that, in its current version, the use of this classification system in daily practice is questionable and it is unsuitable for comparative endoscopic research. We therefore suggest introduction of a simplification of the classification system
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.326
DO - https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.326
M3 - Article
C2 - 25331346
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 110
SP - 180
EP - 187
JO - American journal of gastroenterology
JF - American journal of gastroenterology
IS - 1
ER -