Practice patterns, time trends and quality of care of uterine cancer in Belgium: An analysis of the EFFECT database

Joren Vanbraband, Nancy van Damme, Geert Silversmit, Anke de Geyndt, Gauthier Bouche, Gerd Jacomen, Eric de Jonge, Frédéric Goffin, Hannelore Denys, Frédéric Amant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the practice patterns and quality of care for uterine cancer on a national level in Belgium, including trends in practice over the period 2012–2016. Methods: Quality indicators were measured using the EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment (EFFECT) database. Multivariable logistic mixed regression was used to test for associations between the quality indicators and year of diagnosis, adjusted for potential confounders and intra-cluster correlations. Results: The EFFECT database includes 4178 patients diagnosed with uterine cancer in the period 2012–2016. Minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic-assisted) was applied in 61.6% of patients who had surgery for clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma (EC), increasing from 52.9% in 2012 to 66.4% in 2016. At least pelvic lymph node staging was performed in 69.0% of patients with clinical stage I, high-grade EC; and in 63.9% of patients with clinical stage I-II serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma or carcinosarcoma. The latter increased from 48.8% in 2012 to 77.2% in 2016. Adjuvant radiotherapy (external beam and/or brachytherapy) was offered to 33.5% of patients who had surgery without lymph node staging for pathological stage I EC at high-intermediate or high risk of recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 64.4% of patients with pathological stage III-IVA EC. Conclusions: Study results indicate an overall good quality of care for patients with uterine cancer in Belgium. Treatment areas with potential room for improvement include the use of minimally invasive surgery, comprehensive surgical staging and adjuvant therapy, which confirms the remaining controversies in uterine cancer treatment and the need for further research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-78
Number of pages9
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume180
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Adjuvant treatment
  • Diagnostic work-up
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Pathology
  • Patterns of care
  • Population-based
  • Quality of care
  • Staging
  • Surgical treatment
  • Time trends
  • Treatment patterns
  • Uterine cancer

Cite this