TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation test success in patients with subcutaneous ICD
T2 - A subanalysis of the PRAETORIAN-DFT trial
AU - Knops, Reinoud E.
AU - el-Chami, Mikhael F.
AU - Marquie, Christelle
AU - Nordbeck, Peter
AU - Quast, Anne-Floor B. E.
AU - Tilz, Roland.R.
AU - Brouwer, Tom F.
AU - Lambiase, Pier D.
AU - Cassidy, Christopher J.
AU - Boersma, Lucas V. A.
AU - Burke, Martin C.
AU - Pepplinkhuizen, Shari
AU - de Veld, Jolien A.
AU - de Weger, Anouk
AU - Bracke, Frank A. L. E.
AU - Manyam, Harish
AU - Probst, Vincent
AU - Betts, Timothy R.
AU - Bijsterveld, Nick R.
AU - Defaye, Pascal
AU - Demming, Thomas
AU - Elders, Jan
AU - Field, Duncan C.
AU - Ghani, Abdul
AU - Golovchiner, Gregory
AU - de Jong, Jonas S. S. G.
AU - Lewis, Nigel
AU - Marijon, Eloi
AU - Martin, Claire A.
AU - Miller, Marc.A.
AU - Shaik, Naushad A.
AU - van der Stuijt, Willeke
AU - Kuschyk, J. rgen
AU - Olde Nordkamp, Louise.R. A.
AU - Arya, Anita
AU - Borger van der Burg, Alida E.
AU - Boveda, Serge
AU - van Doorn, Dirk J.
AU - Glikson, Michael
AU - Kaiser, Lukas
AU - Maass, Alexander.H.
AU - van Woerkens, L. on J. P. M.
AU - Zaidi, Amir
AU - Wilde, Arthur A. M.
AU - Smeding, Lonneke
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Background: The PRAETORIAN score estimates the risk of failure of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy by using generator and lead positioning on bidirectional chest radiographs. The PRospective randomized compArative trial of subcutanEous implanTable cardiOverter-defibrillatoR ImplANtation with and without DeFibrillation Testing (PRAETORIAN-DFT) investigates whether PRAETORIAN score calculation is noninferior to defibrillation testing (DFT) with regard to first shock efficacy in spontaneous events. Objective: This prespecified subanalysis assessed the predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation success in induced ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: This multicenter investigator-initiated trial randomized 965 patients between DFT and PRAETORIAN score calculation after de novo S-ICD implantation. Successful DFT was defined as conversion of induced ventricular arrhythmia in <5 seconds from shock delivery within 2 attempts. Bidirectional chest radiographs were obtained after implantation. The predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for DFT success was calculated for patients in the DFT arm. Results: In total, 482 patients were randomized to undergo DFT. Of these patients, 457 (95%) underwent DFT according to protocol, of whom 445 (97%) had successful DFT and 12 (3%) had failed DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 had a positive predictive value of 25% for failed DFT, and a PRAETORIAN score of <90 had a negative predictive value of 99% for successful DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 was the strongest independent predictor for failed DFT (odds ratio 33.77; confidence interval 6.13–279.95; P <.001). Conclusion: A PRAETORIAN score of <90 serves as a reliable indicator for DFT success in patients with S-ICD, and a PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 is a strong predictor for DFT failure.
AB - Background: The PRAETORIAN score estimates the risk of failure of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy by using generator and lead positioning on bidirectional chest radiographs. The PRospective randomized compArative trial of subcutanEous implanTable cardiOverter-defibrillatoR ImplANtation with and without DeFibrillation Testing (PRAETORIAN-DFT) investigates whether PRAETORIAN score calculation is noninferior to defibrillation testing (DFT) with regard to first shock efficacy in spontaneous events. Objective: This prespecified subanalysis assessed the predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for defibrillation success in induced ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: This multicenter investigator-initiated trial randomized 965 patients between DFT and PRAETORIAN score calculation after de novo S-ICD implantation. Successful DFT was defined as conversion of induced ventricular arrhythmia in <5 seconds from shock delivery within 2 attempts. Bidirectional chest radiographs were obtained after implantation. The predictive value of the PRAETORIAN score for DFT success was calculated for patients in the DFT arm. Results: In total, 482 patients were randomized to undergo DFT. Of these patients, 457 (95%) underwent DFT according to protocol, of whom 445 (97%) had successful DFT and 12 (3%) had failed DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 had a positive predictive value of 25% for failed DFT, and a PRAETORIAN score of <90 had a negative predictive value of 99% for successful DFT. A PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 was the strongest independent predictor for failed DFT (odds ratio 33.77; confidence interval 6.13–279.95; P <.001). Conclusion: A PRAETORIAN score of <90 serves as a reliable indicator for DFT success in patients with S-ICD, and a PRAETORIAN score of ≥90 is a strong predictor for DFT failure.
KW - Defibrillation testing
KW - PRAETORIAN score
KW - Subcutaneous ICD
KW - Transvenous ICD
KW - Ventricular arrhythmia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188722072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 38336193
SN - 1547-5271
VL - 21
SP - 836
EP - 844
JO - Heart Rhythm
JF - Heart Rhythm
IS - 6
ER -