Prospective ECG triggering reduces prosthetic heart valve-induced artefacts compared with retrospective ECG gating on 256-slice CT

Petr Symersky, Jesse Habets, Paul Westers, Bas A. J. M. de Mol, Mathias Prokop, Ricardo P. J. Budde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has diagnostic value for the evaluation of prosthetic heart valve (PHV) dysfunction but it is hampered by artefacts. We hypothesised that image acquisition using prospective triggering instead of retrospective gating would reduce artefacts related to pulsating PHV. Methods In a pulsatile in vitro model, a mono- and bileaflet PHV were imaged using 256 MDCT at 60, 75 and 90 beats per minute (BPM) with either retrospective gating (120 kV, 600 mAs, pitch 0.2, CTDIvol 39.8 mGy) or prospective triggering (120 kV, 200 mAs, CTDIvol 13.3 mGy). Two thresholds (> 175 and <-45HU), derived from the density of surrounding structures, were used for quantification of hyper- and hypodense artefacts. Image noise and artefacts were compared between protocols. Results Prospective triggering reduced hyperdense artefacts for both valves at every BPM ( = 0.001 all comparisons). Hypodense artefacts were reduced for the monoleaflet valve at 60 ( = 0.009), 75 ( = 0.016) and 90 BPM ( = 0.001), and for the bileaflet valves at 60 ( = 0.001), 90 ( = 0.001) but not at 75 BPM ( = 0.6). Prospective triggering reduced image noise at 60 ( = 0.001) and 75 ( <0.03) but not at 90 BPM. Conclusions Compared with retrospective gating, prospective triggering reduced most artefacts related to pulsating PHV in vitro. Key Points Computed tomographic images are often degraded by prosthetic heart valve-induced artefacts Prospective triggering reduces prosthetic heart valve-induced artefacts in vitro Artefact reduction at 90 beats per minute occurs without image noise reduction Prospective triggering may improve CT image quality of moving hyperdense structures
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1271-1277
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this