Protective Factors in Forensic Practice: The Added Value of the SAPROF-Extended Version Pilot in Relation to Aggressive Incidents

Leen Cappon, Armin Jentsch, Saskia Roggeman, Michiel de Vries Robbé

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Protective factors are now commonly included in comprehensive risk assessment. This study concerns an initial validation of the new SAPROF-Extended Version (SAPROF-EV) pilot, containing modifications and additions to the original SAPROF. For 139 forensic psychiatric inpatients, assessment results with the SAPROF-EV pilot and HCR-20V3 were compared with aggressive incidents. Results show good predictive validity for the SAPROF-EV pilot for all outcomes and incremental predictive validity for both the (modified) original SAPROF and the full SAPROF-EV pilot over the HCR-20V3. For the outcome aggression toward others, the additional SAPROF-EV factors provide incremental predictive validity over the (modified) original SAPROF. In addition, the user feedback from clinicians highlights experienced additional value of the new factors for treatment guidance. Based on the findings from this study, the SAPROF-EV pilot will be adjusted further into an improved and enhanced version of the SAPROF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1603-1622
Number of pages20
JournalCRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR
Volume50
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • SAPROF
  • aggression
  • predictive validity
  • protective factors
  • risk assessment

Cite this