TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological theories of depressive relapse and recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
AU - Brouwer, Marlies E.
AU - Williams, Alishia D.
AU - Kennis, Mitzy
AU - Fu, Zhongfang
AU - Klein, Nicola S.
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Bockting, Claudi L. H.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Psychological factors hypothesized to account for relapse of major depressive disorder (MDD) roughly originate from five main theories: Cognitive, diathesis-stress, behavioural, psychodynamic, and personality-based. In a meta-analysis we investigated prospective, longitudinal evidence for these leading psychological theories and their factors in relation to depressive relapse. Included studies needed to establish history of MDD and prospective depressive relapse through a clinical interview, have a longitudinal and prospective design, and measure at least one theory-derived factor before relapse. We identified 66 eligible articles out of 43,586 records published up to November 2018. Pooled odds ratios (OR) indicated a significant relationship between the cognitive, behavioural, and personality-based theories and depressive relapse (cognitive: k = 17, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.10–1.40; behavioural, k = 8, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05–1.25; personality: k = 12, OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.02–1.54), but not for the psychodynamic theories (k = 4, OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.83–1.99). Pooled hazard ratios of the theories were not significant. There were no articles identified for the diathesis-stress theories. To conclude, there is a restricted number of prospective studies, and some evidence that the cognitive, behavioural, and personality-based theories indeed partially account for depressive relapse.
AB - Psychological factors hypothesized to account for relapse of major depressive disorder (MDD) roughly originate from five main theories: Cognitive, diathesis-stress, behavioural, psychodynamic, and personality-based. In a meta-analysis we investigated prospective, longitudinal evidence for these leading psychological theories and their factors in relation to depressive relapse. Included studies needed to establish history of MDD and prospective depressive relapse through a clinical interview, have a longitudinal and prospective design, and measure at least one theory-derived factor before relapse. We identified 66 eligible articles out of 43,586 records published up to November 2018. Pooled odds ratios (OR) indicated a significant relationship between the cognitive, behavioural, and personality-based theories and depressive relapse (cognitive: k = 17, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.10–1.40; behavioural, k = 8, OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05–1.25; personality: k = 12, OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.02–1.54), but not for the psychodynamic theories (k = 4, OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.83–1.99). Pooled hazard ratios of the theories were not significant. There were no articles identified for the diathesis-stress theories. To conclude, there is a restricted number of prospective studies, and some evidence that the cognitive, behavioural, and personality-based theories indeed partially account for depressive relapse.
KW - Major depressive disorder
KW - Psychological theories
KW - Recurrence
KW - Relapse
KW - Review
KW - Vulnerability factors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075020920&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31756681
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075020920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075020920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101773
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101773
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31756681
SN - 0272-7358
VL - 74
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Clinical psychology review
JF - Clinical psychology review
M1 - 101773
ER -