Public Reporting of Performance Indicators in Long-Term Care in Canada: Does it Make a Difference?

Mircha Poldrugovac, Joseph Emmanuel Amuah, Helen Wei-Randall, Patricia Sidhom, Kathleen Morris, Sara Allin, Niek Klazinga, Dionne Kringos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evidence of the impact of public reporting of health care performance on quality improvement is not yet sufficient for definitive conclusions to be drawn, despite the important policy implications. This study explored the association of public reporting of performance indicators of long-term care facilities in Canada with performance trends. We considered 16 performance indicators in long-term care in Canada, 8 of which are publicly reported at a facility level, whereas the other 8 are not publicly reported, between the fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2018-2019. Data from 1,087 long-term care facilities were included. Improving trends were observed among publicly reported indicators more often than among indicators that were not publicly reported. Our analysis also suggests that the association between publication of data and improvement is stronger among indicators for which there was no improvement prior to publication and among the worst performing facilities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-576
Number of pages12
JournalCanadian Journal on Aging
Volume41
Issue number4
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2022

Keywords

  • aging
  • health care
  • long-term care
  • nursing homes
  • public reporting of healthcare data
  • quality improvement
  • quality indicators

Cite this