TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiographic Landmark Measurements for the Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex May Be Affected by Visible Femoral Shaft Length on Lateral Knee Radiographs
AU - Bhimani, Rohan
AU - Ashkani-Esfahani, Soheil
AU - Mirochnik, Karina
AU - Lubberts, Bart
AU - Waryasz, Gregory
AU - Tanaka, Miho J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Purpose: To assess the effect of visible femoral shaft length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC). Methods: In 9 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and its proximal and distal boundaries were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were assessed in 1-cm length increments, beginning 1 cm proximal to the medial condyle and continuing proximally to 8 cm. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line through the proximal margin of the medial condyle. In addition, the MPFC midpoint was assessed relative to a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line. Results: Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the MPFC radiographic landmark moved anteriorly with decreasing visible femoral shaft on radiographs, particularly at 4 cm and less. However, no proximal–distal change was noted. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between visible femoral shaft and MPFC position on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B = –0.636, P < .001). For every centimeter decrease in the visible femoral shaft, the radiographic MPFC footprint moved anteriorly by 0.636 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral shaft on lateral radiographs is required for accurate MPFC footprint localization (area under the curve = 0.80; sensitivity = 76.7%; specificity = 69.0%; P < .001). In contrast, no anterior–posterior change was seen when referencing a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line. Conclusions: When using the posterior cortical line to identify the midpoint of the MPFC, at least 4 cm of femoral shaft should be visible for accurate assessment. If less than 4 cm of shaft is visible, a line through the midpoint of Blumensaat line and the proximal posterior cortex can be used as an alternative method to estimate the position of the femoral footprint. Clinical Relevance: As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide when assessing femoral tunnel placement on fluoroscopy.
AB - Purpose: To assess the effect of visible femoral shaft length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC). Methods: In 9 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and its proximal and distal boundaries were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were assessed in 1-cm length increments, beginning 1 cm proximal to the medial condyle and continuing proximally to 8 cm. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line through the proximal margin of the medial condyle. In addition, the MPFC midpoint was assessed relative to a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line. Results: Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the MPFC radiographic landmark moved anteriorly with decreasing visible femoral shaft on radiographs, particularly at 4 cm and less. However, no proximal–distal change was noted. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between visible femoral shaft and MPFC position on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B = –0.636, P < .001). For every centimeter decrease in the visible femoral shaft, the radiographic MPFC footprint moved anteriorly by 0.636 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral shaft on lateral radiographs is required for accurate MPFC footprint localization (area under the curve = 0.80; sensitivity = 76.7%; specificity = 69.0%; P < .001). In contrast, no anterior–posterior change was seen when referencing a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line. Conclusions: When using the posterior cortical line to identify the midpoint of the MPFC, at least 4 cm of femoral shaft should be visible for accurate assessment. If less than 4 cm of shaft is visible, a line through the midpoint of Blumensaat line and the proximal posterior cortex can be used as an alternative method to estimate the position of the femoral footprint. Clinical Relevance: As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide when assessing femoral tunnel placement on fluoroscopy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181235833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.025
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.11.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 38056724
SN - 0749-8063
VL - 40
SP - 1858
EP - 1866
JO - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
JF - Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
IS - 6
ER -